Home > Science and technology > Mobile and gadget
Reading time estimate: 7 min

You say: Should Samsung only equip its flagships with a Snapdragon chip?

BingMag.com <b>You</b> <b>say:</b> <b>Should</b> <b>Samsung</b> <b>only</b> <b>equip</b> its <b>flagships</b> with a <b>Snapdragon</b> chip?

Snapdragon or Exynos? This is a question that is repeatedly asked on virtual networks, various news agencies, etc., and usually the result is in favor of Qualcomm and Snapdragon chips. But there are good reasons to continue to trust Samsung.

Remember 2011? At a time when all smartphones were less than 5 inches in size, the company we now refer to as the largest and best smartphone maker in the world decided to look different. As a result of this different thinking, a product with a 5.3-inch screen was born under the name Galaxy Note. The phone was so criticized that we thought it would fail as soon as it hit the market. Imagine for a second You were transposed into the karmic driven world of Earl. They trusted differently, but competing companies tried to destroy this pure and courageous idea. As a result of this trust, the Samsung market expanded, with more and more users interested in buying the Galaxy Note, and we saw more and more people writing with their pens on the big screen of their phones. Support for users and persistence for Samsung has made smartphones bigger and bigger from generation to generation. The idea was so intriguing and pure that it now looks weird to anyone with a small-screen phone.

Another similar story is the clamshell phone. We are now seeing more and more fans of these products, but it has not been long since we saw the news of the premature breakdown of Samsung's first generation clamshell phone, the Galaxy Fold. In 2019, Samsung decided to launch its first attempt to produce clamshell products in the form of a smartphone called the Galaxy Fold. This phone was so bad that it both disappointed everyone with the clamshell phones and made them feel reluctant to do so. But now the situation has changed so much that we are now waiting for any company to launch a new clamshell phone.

BingMag.com <b>You</b> <b>say:</b> <b>Should</b> <b>Samsung</b> <b>only</b> <b>equip</b> its <b>flagships</b> with a <b>Snapdragon</b> chip?

Users are unaware of the existence of a very thin protective layer on the Galaxy Fold display that would cause the display to crash

The market appeared, but it was able to create a new need and thus revolutionize the design of smartphones. The same thing is happening now. With the difference that now we see criticism and pressure from users and from Samsung, as always, continuity. For several years, the Korean company has been launching its handsets with the Exynos chip to the global market, and for a number of specific markets, such as China, the United States, and sometimes South Korea, is considering models equipped with Snapdragon.

Users are rightly dissatisfied with the performance of Exynos chips, and the logical question is, when they pay the same amount as users around the world, why Should they buy a flagship that consumes power, processing performance, graphics power, Is image processing and much more poor performance compared to models equipped with a competitor (Snapdragon) processor? This question is quite valid and the protests are undoubtedly logical. Unfortunately, Samsung's not paying attention to this.

The problem is that Samsung is a little proud of the tragic events that happened to it in the past and could easily get over them, and thinks it can. Easily overcome this problem. But personally, since I found out about the handsets, I hear that users want to retire Exynos chips, because their performance is significantly weaker than Snapdragon chips. Samsung decided to abandon the use of its proprietary cores, which were a major cause of these problems, and partnered with ARM. As a result, Exynos chips were technologically equal to Snapdragon in terms of technology, type, number, and arrangement of cores.

But not everything was equal, and it did not solve the problem. Apparently the problem was and still is with Samsung itself. The chips coming out of the company's product line seem to be cursed because we do not see good performance from Qualcomm representatives during the two years that the company is responsible for making Snapdragon, but when TSMC produces them, the situation improves. Now, it is not clear why Samsung has made up to date with the production of high-quality chips. But the first attempt with the Exynos 2200 was a complete failure. Although Samsung's first-generation Snapdragon 8 rival, which is made by Samsung, has no specific definition, but at least in terms of initial processing power and graphics, it is much better (the performance of both chips drops sharply after a while).> BingMag.com <b>You</b> <b>say:</b> <b>Should</b> <b>Samsung</b> <b>only</b> <b>equip</b> its <b>flagships</b> with a <b>Snapdragon</b> chip?

Results of various benchmarks showing the performance of Qualcomm 8th generation Snapdragon 8 How much better than the Samsung Exynos 2200 (these tests have not tested performance stability)

Why Snapdragon, why Exynos?

If we want to equip a whole point Samsung flagships Qualcomm chips In this case, at least we can rest assured that users around the world have a flagship with the same processing power and price, and the user no longer has to pay the same price, but with a weaker ear. 2020 was the year when the difference between the Exynos and Snapdragon chips peaked and the protests happened to escalate sharply from that year. When Samsung used the Snapdragon 865 in the Galaxy S20 shipped to the US and China and the Exynos 990 in the models shipped to Korea, Europe and the rest of the world. The Exynos chip performed so poorly that Samsung assembled its flagships in Korea and made available Snapdragon-equipped models. Because the Exynos 990 was so hot, it was poorer in image processing, less fuel efficient, and many other bad things that even led users to request that Samsung no longer use Exynos chips in its handsets with a written request and multiple signatures. p>

Another advantage of using Snapdragon chips for all Samsung flagships is that the Korean company can then equip all its flagships with the good capabilities of these chips and no longer have to equip a series of good features only for the model. Hold on to Snapdragon and make use of Exynos-equipped models. Because under a contract, one chip Should not support a range of other chip-exclusive features in a phone.

Some believe that Samsung's current policy could more easily meet the needs, especially now that We are facing a global chip crisis. In addition, it is said that if one of the chips once had poor performance, Samsung could at least have an alternative option to offer, but if it uses only one chip, if there is a problem, it can not easily fix it. Just like this year, even in Iran, the Galaxy S22s are available with the Snapdragon chip, because the models equipped with the Exynos 2200 came on the market a little later.

Another important issue is that Samsung is said to be making completely proprietary chips Works for its flagship phones. Similar to what Apple does. By doing so, the coordination between software and hardware in the Korean company's handsets will increase dramatically, and we may no longer see problems such as overheating and the like in the company's products. Of course, it is said that this will happen in 2025, by which time Samsung will probably enter a new phase of cooperation with AMD and can definitely produce a good product.

What chips do You use for Samsung flagships? You like; Snapdragon or Exynos?

Now it's up to us users; Do we still have to trust Samsung and let it do its job to make another big breakthrough in the smartphone industry, as it has in the past, or does Samsung really have to give up on Exynos chips and accept that it can't? Make a big revolution?

What do You think? Do You think this insistence from Samsung will lead to good things, or Should the Korean company equip all its flagships with just one chip, namely Snapdragon chips?


Source: Android Authority

READ NEXT IN: science and technology / mobile and gadget

BingMag.com Give up the phones and live a little, says the inventor of the phone mobile and gadget

Martin Cooper, the inventor of the world's first mobile phone, said in an interview with the BBC Breakfast program that people should cut down on smartphones and live a little.

BingMag.com What is pixel density and how does it affect the quality of images? mobile and gadget

For many users, it is important that the product they buy has a high-quality display. But in front of the display part of a product, a lot of information and numbers are written that we don't know whi

BingMag.com How to change the Wi-Fi password of the modem? mobile and gadget

These days, almost every home has a Wi-Fi modem that is used to connect to the Internet. But in order to increase security, you must specify a password for the Wi-Fi network. By default, modems have a

BingMag.com Steve Jobs; Mr. Khas of the technology world mobile and gadget

Steve Paul Jobs on February 24, 1955 He was born in San Francisco, California. He did not achieve significant success in education, but he had extraordinary talent in business and found a way to succe