Apple, however, seems to be very difficult with the first and last two changes. No, but when it comes to the app's side-by-side name on iPhones, the company seems quite strict and impenetrable. At the IAPP conference, Tim Cook talked about a variety of things, but when it came to app downloads, the CEO of the US company was a little excited because that's one of Apple's most important concerns.
Users of Android phones have never experienced such a concern, but iOS users know exactly what we are talking about. If you are a content creator and your job is to download a good quality video editing application, the App Store will definitely get the job done, but if you want to download a file from an external source such as Google and install it on your phone, by no means You will not be allowed. The American company will not allow applications to be installed on iPhones from a source other than the App Store unless you jailbreak them, which is called rooting, and we suggest that you do not do so at all.
Apple always has an idea The disgusting app downloaded on the iPhone was and still is. Not only does this, according to the company itself, reduce the security of its popular operating system, but it also eliminates one of the tools by which Apple restricted its users to its ecosystem. Of course, not to lose, but to deprive the company of freedom of action. Even so, owning one is still beyond the reach of the average person. A new EU law stipulates that companies wishing to sell their products in this market must provide users with a range of options, including compatibility of iPhones with different chargers, activation of features such as iMessage He pointed out that it has been closed for a long time and the possibility of downloading applications without the need for the permission of the App Store.
There is no point in forcing it. Because the company makes good money this way, and its users do their work with a small fine as long as they do not limit the restrictions. However, the European Union is trying to impose heavy fines on companies that do not follow these rules.
Google is doing more to protect its users
You are right. Apple is like a big castle that can not be penetrated through its walls. Therefore, placing different defense systems on these walls does not seem very logical. But on the other hand, Android is so pervasive that Google has been forced to consider all kinds of security methods for it. The main reason for this is that Android is an open source operating system with the ability to download applications. Whether or not it is active. This security system removes malicious programs from your phone or warns you that it is unsafe, both when you download and install it from the Play Store and other sources. This means you have the freedom to act, but when you have a problem, there are ways you can solve it. It's not a perfect solution, but it has worked well and satisfactorily.
Apple has such a care system because all the apps come from the App Store and do not need to be checked. The quality of the apps in the Apple Store is exemplary, but you are not allowed to download the app from a source other than the App Store. Therefore, the existence of a security system is also very useful Does not come.
We do not intend to convince you which one is better than the other. In fact, the goal is just to tell the truth about the sideload. A feature that Google decided to fight with when it made it available for Android, but Apple did not allow itself to enter into a challenge like this. Because he seems to have to redesign a powerful protection system for it. Now the question arises whether the restriction is good if it is in exchange for security?
The main issue is the policy of stores
Android and iOS, since they are mobile operating systems, have similar performance in different areas. For example, in relation to how to run applications. You install an application on your phone, give it a series of permissions to access important or unimportant information (depending on the type of app), and occasionally encounter problems that the developer often fixes by sending patches.
Sideload should be the same. Unless you jailbreak or root your phone, the operating system itself knows how to get apps to behave according to a specific policy. On Android phones, apps that can't be protected by PlayProte will be removed, and if Apple allows sideloads on its phones, the security system it designs will have exactly the same function. So what is all this resistance for? Perhaps the only thing that can not be enforced on third-party applications in this case is the rules and policies of the stores themselves. Rules that are also very important.
In order for an application developer to go to Google Play, they have to do a series of things. For example, informing you about the privacy and information it wants to receive from you and how to do this process. Android alone can not apply such rules to all applications because applications have their own way of collecting data. The company with which a developer advertises their application must also comply with Google's rules, otherwise their application will be excluded from the Play Store.
If there is no application in the Play Store However, it does not have to follow any of Google's policies. This means that a developer could theoretically lie to you about what data and how it is collected from your phone and get important information from you.
Another way That Google intends to protect users within the Play Store is related to the in-app payment and purchasing system. A developer must comply with Google's rules in this regard in order to be allowed to publish their app in the store and to protect the user's security. Although they can have their own payment process, they are required to follow Google as long as they are in the Play Store.
Which one do you trust? Google or someone you know, for example? If I'm an app developer that my app is worth paying for, why should I put it in the Google Play Store and give the company a big chunk (30%)? But as a user, I'll definitely trust Google more than myself as a developer!
Data is valuable
To be honest, there are many developers who break these rules in order to achieve their goals. Now this goal can be to get all the hassle of building an app or all the cost of in-app purchases or stealing your important information. They will force you to download the application anyway. Even in stores that have a set of rules for apps.
Do we think Tim Cook is opposed to app downloads because of this? If so, then Android should have been destroyed by now. What seems to be forcing Apple to accept any fine and pressure, but not under the weight of such a change, is what we all know; Money! The problem is simple. Apple makes a lot of money this way. From in-app purchases to app purchases and everything related to the App Store in general. This store is an incredibly large source of revenue for the American company, and now tell me why Apple should lose such a resource?
Money seems to be the only thing that drives companies like Apple and Google to Doing the things they are doing now leads to. It is also natural. They have to fight for money and they need to do this as much as they can to put the users inside their impenetrable fortress. Now this castle does not allow you to enter the world of iOS at all, but in the world of Android, the key to the gate is in your hands and you have to deal with the dangers that may exist outside <. Finally, we need to point out that user data is valuable and not unreasonable. Companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, Facebook are willing to make millions of dollars. Pay the fine, but this data does not fall into the hands of third-party companies.
iOS is more secure than Android; Is this a true belief?
Class of personal experience, really if we want to be fair, by not downloading apps Strange from sources we do not know at all, Android will not have any security problems. On the other hand, there are many users for whom security issues are not important at all. So the superiority of iOS over Android when it comes to security is just something that goes through the mouths of some Apple fans, otherwise in practice we see that they do not pay any particular attention to this data, they have no knowledge at all about the data collection process. The same is true for some users of the Android operating system.
The point is that when some users migrate to the iOS ecosystem, they not only accept the restriction and restrict the download of strange apps, but also the restriction. They consider it a good omen and take it as a good omen. Because of its support, Apple does not change its policy, which does not mention users as the main reason for this policy change. On the other hand, the same users enter the Android world, download any good and bad applications from various sources, and if there is a problem, they leave it to the weakness of the operating system, not the curiosity that has arisen as a result of absolute freedom in Android.
Given that the number of Apple users is increasing day by day, it seems that users have accepted that absolute freedom at the operating system level of the phone is not a good idea because it can not be controlled in this case and was limited to the rules. companies. So there has to be an external control factor, and Apple does exactly that.
With all these interpretations, there are those who have good reasons. Why do they think they should be free when they do not need it? This is where the other benefits of iOS, such as optimal power consumption, unparalleled hardware compatibility, long-lasting updates, become the benchmark.
What do you think of the following questions, though? Do you think Apple has only been able to direct the minds of people to believe that the company's operating system is more secure than Android by imposing restrictions? In general, what is your opinion about the security of the two operating systems, Android and iOS? Do you see Apple's reasons for not granting permission to add the Sideload feature to iOS?
Source: Android Central