Poco F4 GT appeared in a disappointing game test

The Poco F4 GT, which was launched as a universal version of the Redmi K50 gaming, performed very poorly in tests performed to evaluate its gaming performance. Xiaomi unveiled the Redmi K50 Gaming Edition as its gaming phone earlier this year. The popularity of this phone persuaded Xiaomi to launch a version of it; That's how the Redmi K50 Gaming Edition, called the Poco F4 GT, hit the market to give more users access to it. They have 1 as a beating heart. The processor that Samsung is responsible for building, and since its first phone, we have seen poor performance in terms of stability.

BingMag.com Poco F4 GT appeared in a disappointing game test

The Poco F4 GT, which was launched as a universal version of the Redmi K50 gaming, performed very poorly in tests performed to evaluate its gaming performance. Xiaomi unveiled the Redmi K50 Gaming Edition as its gaming phone earlier this year. The popularity of this phone persuaded Xiaomi to launch a version of it; That's how the Redmi K50 Gaming Edition, called the Poco F4 GT, hit the market to give more users access to it. They have 1 as a beating heart. The processor that Samsung is responsible for building, and since its first phone, we have seen poor performance in terms of stability.

The same problem plagued the Poco F4 GT. This phone, which as a gaming product should have a very good performance in terms of stability, appeared quite the opposite, and in a recent test to check its status in the game, it appeared extremely poor.

BingMag.com Poco F4 GT appeared in a disappointing game test

A test that shows that Apple and Qualcomm chips may perform well early in the test but later After a while, they have nothing to say about MediaTek chips

Compared to all the phones that participated in this test, the Poco F4 GT showed the worst performance. The Galaxy S22 Ultra, for example, finished the test with a score of 57.4 frames, the Exynos 2200 version scored a good 56.7, even the Galaxy S20 Ultra two years ago, which had the Exynos 990 disaster processor. Finished with a score of 55.8 frames. But the performance of the Poco F4 GT with a score of 47.5 frames was not acceptable at all. Know the market gaming phone in terms of processing performance in terms of energy consumption.

Of course, Qualcomm is partly to blame, and this phone can not be blamed entirely. Even the Galaxy S22 Ultra with this chip when it was able to finish the test, the temperature had reached about 45 degrees, which is very high. The Snapdragon 8 Generation 1 is known for its performance instability, and now once again we saw its poor performance in a test.

They finished with a score of 59.6 and 59.5, respectively, while their temperatures were 39.6 and 39 degrees, respectively. This means that the performance of the Redmi K50 Pro with 9000 diversity was even better and more acceptable than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, which was able to finish the test with a good score of 59.1 frames but a temperature of 45.1 degrees.

However, he may not be the only culprit in Xiaomi's story, but he is definitely the first-line defendant. Ordinary phones, if they get hot, may not be much of an objection because they are not gaming-specific, but a gaming phone expects nothing more than stable performance. But Xiaomi and Poco also proved to be really weak in meeting this need. However, there are no restrictions on the design of a gaming phone, and companies can also consider good coolers for these products.

It remains to be seen what Poco and Xiaomi's response to this poor result will be. Was.

Source: NotebookCheck

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.