How realistic is the claim of Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Mythology and historical reality

Henry, the character that the player takes on in Kingdom Come: Deliverance, is designed to be like a human in reality. to seem If he does not eat enough food, he will be hungry; It becomes drowsy if it stays awake too much; And if he takes a bath slowly, people will call him your mother. No one expects Henry to be a perfect simulator of human biologyplayers don't need a tape telling them when to trim Henry's nails, anywaybut this simulation of reality goes hand in hand with making him a character that feels real and alive. To make the art believable, of course, things were chosen and things were left outthings that were important to Kingdom Come's designers and things that weren't. This itself, if we look at it microscopically, is a reflection of the creators' priorities as to exactly which parts of history deserve to be retold. Historically, he has made decisions that are worth showing and not. The story takes place in the early 15th century in the Kingdom of Bohemia (now known as Central Bohemia in the Czech Republic). Here we see the evolution and political conflict between the half-brothers of the Luxembourg dynasty: King Wenceslas IV and Sigismund, who becomes the future king of the Holy Roman Empire (and then Hungary and Croatia).

BingMag.com How realistic is the claim of Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Mythology and historical reality

Henry, the character that the player takes on in Kingdom Come: Deliverance, is designed to be like a human in reality. to seem If he does not eat enough food, he will be hungry; It becomes drowsy if it stays awake too much; And if he takes a bath slowly, people will call him your mother. No one expects Henry to be a perfect simulator of human biologyplayers don't need a tape telling them when to trim Henry's nails, anywaybut this simulation of reality goes hand in hand with making him a character that feels real and alive. To make the art believable, of course, things were chosen and things were left outthings that were important to Kingdom Come's designers and things that weren't. This itself, if we look at it microscopically, is a reflection of the creators' priorities as to exactly which parts of history deserve to be retold. Historically, he has made decisions that are worth showing and not. The story takes place in the early 15th century in the Kingdom of Bohemia (now known as Central Bohemia in the Czech Republic). Here we see the evolution and political conflict between the half-brothers of the Luxembourg dynasty: King Wenceslas IV and Sigismund, who becomes the future king of the Holy Roman Empire (and then Hungary and Croatia).

The title itself Introduced as "based on historical reality" and a reconstruction of Central Bohemia in 1403, it was built by builders in Prague called Warhorse Studios and claims to create a "true medieval experience". The game's many visual references to the materials used for buildings, clothing and manuscripts, as well as its descriptions of the coinage process and the design of toilets and waste management methods in the Middle Ages, undoubtedly testify to the desire to be faithful to history.

BingMag.com How realistic is the claim of Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Mythology and historical reality

But retelling history always means to portray a series of events in bold and a series of events in low light. It is not possible to show the full scale of human experience. What is boldedor omitted altogethersays more about the historian's interests than the history itself. This issue is strongly reflected in a historical novel like Kingdom Come, and he has to decide which period he wants to be an objective reflection of among all these different centuries of Central Europe. Henry is captured by Sigismund, the player reaches Talmberg with the other flood of refugees. Henry, who is nothing more than a blacksmith's son, suddenly finds himself in the service of the local emir, is trained by the guards and steps on the path of becoming a knight. Although the tension between the central Bohemian politicians is the central issue of the game, Henry spends most of his time with people of little political importance. He travels to the countryside and enters places filled with farmers and millers, bandits and monks, always lurking under the threat of foreigners who have entered his country.

None of these foreigners, from Hungarians to German invaders. Koman, they are not depicted correctly. The Kingdom of Bohemia is in trouble because that "foreigner" Sigismund has abandoned his throne in Hungary and come to plunder, and the "barbarian Turks" with him are as savage as his cavalry. The first image that the story gives of the Turks are people who want to rape a local woman, and their speech is unintelligible because they are one of the few characters who do not have English subtitles when they speak. Cumans are constantly portrayed as a source of terror. Early in the work, Henry refers to them as "evil barbarians who come from the East and care nothing for the laws of war." Others call the Cumans "savages" or "godless dogs". One of the characters assures us that although "all armies shed blood, take booty and rape", it is the Cumans who "enjoy these things". The outsider, Sigismund is presented as a mere Hungarian, while he is as much a Bohemian as his brother Wenceslas IV. "The Hungarians: A Thousand Years of Victory in Defeat" (The Hungarians: A Thousand Years of Victory in Defeat), written by Paul Lendvai, says that even in Hungary, Sigismund was "a very unpopular person who was known as an influence and outsider" because He interfered in Bohemia and ignored the affairs of Hungary. Another Hungarian in the story, an evil nobleman named Istvan Toth, is again another character that Henry constantly confronts and is depicted as a negative person. Showing Germans is not better than Hungarians and Cumans. They are shown to be untrustworthy, and early on in the tutorial, Henry is confronted by one of them who is a cheating, talkative, and drunken knight (the two later have a not-so-good relationship).

Henry, and the others he talks to, consider the foreigners to be godless, terrifying, or a threat to their existence because they don't understand them, and the story itself doesn't try to make us understand them. A historical novel, of course, which can adapt the views of its characters to the historical atmosphere of that time [and the characters have the right to consider foreigners who have invaded their country as evil, like any other common man], but it could have added a little depth and complexity to the foreigners at every opportunity. Kend and whether their actions are really as evil as Henry thinks they are is left out. No attempt is made to suggest that the Cuman mercenaries fought in Bohemia for the same reason as any other mercenary, of any nationality: material gains or political commitment. No attempt is made to talk about the relationship between Czechs and Germans, or Cumans and Hungarians, in order to make them appear a little more humane and mention the cultural and sometimes political similarities of their lands. Like the confused and fearful medieval Czech characters, the player has no chance to gain a historical perspective on the foreigners, and they remain cartoonish villains.

This is nothing new among historical novels, but Kingdom Come It is deliberately designed to reveal itself more deeply. Its page on Steam mentions "fidelity to history" as a key feature of the game and creates the expectation in the audience to "meet historical characters and experience medieval bohemia". A title that considers itself loyal to history demands that its loyalty be checked. If we examine them in relation to history, we conclude that the noble Bohemians, despite belonging to a multi-national empire, their peace and well-being are threatened by the threats of other nations.

Even among the Czech characters, only good men of the image be. The only prominent women in the story are Henry's mother and one of his disposable girlfriends (one of them is killed by the aliens in the initial attack and the other when Henry makes love with her and gets a trophy/achievement from the page fades and other special news from He can't be). Amir Tammelberg's wife (with whom Henry can sleep again) and Henry's farm nurse are among the other prominent women in the story. After the death of his parents, Henry only mentions his father over their bodies. At the end of the work, he finds witches who mistake Henry for the devil and ask him to have sex with them and destroy all the Komans in the area in return for the devil. Henry smokes drugs with them and then kills those who, in his opinion, are dark-skinned goblins. When he wakes up, it turns out that they were just bandits or white loggers. The only interpretation that makes sense here is that Henry imagined the Cumans to be darker than they actually are (although this is not mentioned again).

It is noteworthy that only the homosexual characters are Two are the villains of the story; One is a fraudulent mercenary and the other is his unscrupulous Hungarian lover. As for the way women are portrayed, their disposability is either ignored (like Henry's mother) or made a joke about. Mere intercourse with women enhances artistic abilities (symbolized by the image of a lion and the title "Alpha Male"). Shellwell's sequence of Henry and a monk's love affair with two village girls is not presented as a limited and misogynistic society, but the fun and jokes of a few people who have left the house. But about the gay characters: one of them appears mostly in dark, nightmarish sequences where he either tortures Henry or sneaks into the castle and takes a defenseless woman hostage. On the other hand, when the emirs of the cities find out about his sexual orientation, they sneer and extort money from him. This depiction is clearly hateful.

The way Kingdom Come portrays foreign characters is made worse by its interpretation of its historical period. In 1403, just after the death of King Charles IV, Kingdom Come presents his reign as successful and prosperous. In the coming decades, the Bohemian Hussites (religious reformers) fight against Sigismund, now Holy Roman Emperor, and his Crusaders, which include pro-Catholic European armies, including Hungary. It is more of a lament for the old Bohemian era, when the Czechs, and not the Germans or Austrians or Popes a thousand kilometers away, determined the religious or political destiny of their country. It evokes a sense of national identity in Czechoslovakia and again separates the Czech Bohemians from the German Bohemians. From this point of view, Sigismund, as an external agent and imperial power, is a symbol of those who ate the historical right of the Czech Bohemians and did not let the determination of the destiny and independence of their country be in their own hands.

For such a purpose, the story of the war on He considers the power struggle between Sigismund and Wenceslas IV as history that has a message for today. By turning this history into simple symbols such as checks/good people and foreigners/bad people, on the efforts of many generations of this nation for the right Self-governance implies and reminds the nation's recent history of how it came under the rule of the Soviet Union, the Nazis, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

BingMag.com How realistic is the claim of Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Mythology and historical reality

After the events of Kingdom Come, the Czech Hussites fight against the Catholic Hungarians led by Sigismund (as well as the Catholic Germans living in Bohemia), meanwhile ethnic tension in the country and between neighbors within the empire. Holy Rome is increasing. Placing Sigismund as the symbol of the devil and the foreigner who sows the seeds of hypocrisy, and placing Henry as the symbol of a good-natured Czech-speaking Czech, expresses the spirit of Czechoslovakia: the battle to build a "genuine nation"provided that "foreign forces" Let them and don't corrupt it.

Among all the centuries in the history of medieval Bohemia, choosing this period of time and portraying them negatively, who are not from Czechs, strongly implies national interests. In the introduction to the book "The Czechs and the Lands of the Bohemian Crown", Hugh Agnew writes about Czech national history: "Their past - what they remember, what they willfully forget, and what How they remember and how they forget who and what they are will shape them.

Bohemian reconstruction of 1403 to tell a story in which the Czechs, despite being weaker, are victorious against foreign interference is one of the same things. which Kingdom Come considers important to remember. The debate surrounding the game has rightly focused on the statements of Daniel Vavra, co-founder of Warhorse and director of Kingdom Come who said that "to be true to history" there will be no characters of color in the game. Historical data is not accurate as to the demographic situation of medieval rural Bohemia, and the question is not why people of color are not present, the question is why their exclusion was so important to the history it was trying to show? [so that the story is only about the national struggle of the Czech people].

The only convincing reason is that Kingdom Come has chosen only those things from the past that are ancient to the xenophobic view of Czech history, as far as the picture is concerned. He sees the pulling of linguistic and ethnic minorities to the detriment of history. The issue is not at all what happened in history a few centuries ago, the issue is that the 15th century Bohemia is along the lines of history that says "Czech Republic, only for the Czech people". The situation becomes more acute when we see that President Milos Zeman, who is anti-immigrant and against joining the European Union, wins the country's elections again. On the other hand, populist nationalism rises in the atmosphere of the country and rejects Muslim immigrants. These issues are not unique to the Czech Republic and are only the tip of the iceberg of the disappointing populist policies that have spread in European and North American politics. This issue becomes important because a Czech company claims that it wants to give its audience a faithful and accurate view of medieval Bohemia.

The question that arises in titles like Kingdom Come in general and historical novels in particular is this. Is: What exactly do the audience want to remember about the past? It is easy to look at our national heritage and find examples of values that are important to the modern worldidentity despite political division; victory in the preservation of human rights; Advancement in culture and science due to mixing with different ethnic groups. But focusing on human negative points only motivates us to continue them again and today. Removing these things, for artistic purposes and historical selections, is nothing but distortion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.