Home > Gaming > Gadget
Reading time estimate: 5 min

FSR Graphic Technique Advances; Higher quality with higher frame rate

BingMag.com <b>FSR</b> <b>Graphic</b> <b>Technique</b> <b>Advances;</b> <b>Higher</b> <b>quality</b> with <b>Higher</b> <b>frame</b> rate

AMD's image enhancement system (FSR 2.0) has been released. Of course, this system is currently only available on Death Loop. The FSR system, or FidelityFX Super Resolution, is similar to Nvidia's DLSS or Deep Learning Super Sampling system. These two features allow graphics cards to render images at a lower resolution. Then slightly show the image to the user with a Higher resolution to increase the frame rate. On the other hand, the image quality will not decrease much.

The machine learning capability of the Nvidia system is not yet available in the performance cards. However, FSR 2.0 is a lot better than No. 1. This new system uses all the new frames and techniques to show a high quality image at a Higher frame rate. On the plus side, the FSR 2.0 machine lacks compatibility with slightly older cards.

Most of the best graphics cards are definitely Nvidia. However, the presence of the FSR 2.0 system will make the old revenue cards valuable as well. Currently, because FSR 2.0 is only available on Death Loop, a number of tests have been performed using it.

FSR 2.0 performance at 4K

As mentioned In the image enhancement system, the game is rendered in lower resolution. It is then displayed with a slight change so that it is not much different from the rendering mode at the same resolution. This mode is especially useful in heavy resolutions such as 4K. If you want to consider a lower resolution like 1080p, it has practically no use.

If you compare FSR 2.0 and No. 1 images, you will notice a huge difference. In FSR 1.0, many details were blurred and unclear. Now in issue 2 of this system, these conditions have been eliminated in general. The important point is that the FSR 2.0 system uses the game itself's Anti Aliasing. This is the case with Nvidia's own Anti Aliasing system.

BingMag.com <b>FSR</b> <b>Graphic</b> <b>Technique</b> <b>Advances;</b> <b>Higher</b> <b>quality</b> with <b>Higher</b> <b>frame</b> rate

On the left you see the FSR 2.0 system. The right is also number one on the system.

In terms of reality, FSR 2.0 is very close to DLSS. However, it is not better than that. For this reason, it can not be said that the delivery system is as mature as the Nvidia system. Of course, the difference is so small that many times users will not even notice it. If you zoom in on the images, you'll notice that Nvidia's system is somewhat better.

One of the problems with FSR 2.0 is shaking when shaking. Something that can ruin the game experience for players. On the other hand, some cases, such as red smoke, were not very natural. Of course, these problems can be fixed with an update. Despite these problems, it is safe to say that DLSS is much more advanced at present.

Both Nvidia and Imedi have come closer in terms of increasing frame rates. Both systems are better than rendering the game animation at the desired resolution. At 4K resolution, the performance of Death Loop itself is also strange. However, it must be said that the performance of the credit cards has been very good. For this reason, the cardholders of this company will definitely not be disappointed with its performance. Also, the competition with Nvidia is very close. FSR 2.0 issues will be fixed soon with other updates.

BingMag.com <b>FSR</b> <b>Graphic</b> <b>Technique</b> <b>Advances;</b> <b>Higher</b> <b>quality</b> with <b>Higher</b> <b>frame</b> rate

FSR 2.0 performance in 1440p resolution

Currently, 1440p resolution is one of the most widely used resolutions in monitor panels. This resolution is extremely suitable for gaming and does not put as much pressure on the graphics card as 4K. At 4K resolution, the performance of the FSR 2.0 system was acceptable. However, it can not be said that it was better than DLSS. Interestingly, the performance of FSR 2.0 at 1440p resolution was better than 4K.

In general, the details are very precise and completely clear. On the other hand, this system also makes the game smoother. That's why FSR 2.0 performed so well at this resolution.

BingMag.com <b>FSR</b> <b>Graphic</b> <b>Technique</b> <b>Advances;</b> <b>Higher</b> <b>quality</b> with <b>Higher</b> <b>frame</b> rate

FSR 2.0 are on the left and number 1 is on the right. You can see the progress of FSR 2.0 here.

The problem of red smoke is also seen in this resolution. Also, DLSS still performs better than FSR 2.0. If you want to consider the issue of puberty, Nvidia has a long way to go to improve its cards and eliminate their flaws. In terms of frame rate, all image enhancement systems perform better than game rendering at the same resolution. For this reason, the image quality may be a bit lower, but it has a Higher frame rate.

BingMag.com <b>FSR</b> <b>Graphic</b> <b>Technique</b> <b>Advances;</b> <b>Higher</b> <b>quality</b> with <b>Higher</b> <b>frame</b> rate

One of the interesting points of this FSR 2.0 works better than DLSS in some cases. This badge Shows that development is progressing and is very close to Nvidia. The point is, Nvidia is the exclusive owner of graphics cards. Inventions not only produce graphics cards but also the main processor. As a result, the current focus on graphics cards is less than that of Nvidia.

However, the performance of the system is very good, and both companies are currently producing good cards. Which one the user chooses is entirely up to him and his work. Nvidia cards are now doing better in terms of image enhancement. Because they have a special hardware part for machine learning. Also, the 40 Series cards will be introduced soon and it remains to be seen what Nvidia has in store for the image enhancement system on those cards.

It should be noted that due to the availability of FSR 2.0 for graphics cards Older, these cards became very valuable. Because they are low cost and have one of the best image enhancement systems in them. Also, keep in mind that you should not try FSR 2.0 for 1080p resolution because it is not worth it. However, if you have a 4K screen, you will enjoy the experience of this system.

One of the most admirable practices is approaching DLSS. Now this feature is so close that we can not say which one is superior. So soon we will see more competition between Nvidia and Imedi.


Source: RockPaperShotgun.com

READ NEXT IN: gaming / gadget

BingMag.com Will we see upgraded consoles in the ninth generation? gadget

The PlayStation 4 was released in November 2013, and just three years later Sony released the PlayStation Pro and PlayStation Vior. What is the chance that this will happen again in the current genera

BingMag.com The Xbox App Stream is coming to Samsung TVs and smart monitors gadget

Microsoft's main goal is to expand the Xbox system and increase access to it. That is why he will do his best to achieve this goal. During this time, Microsoft has made great strides in cloud gaming a

BingMag.com Mass production of PlayStation VR 2 will begin in the second half of 2022 gadget

The PlayStation Virtual Reality console called PSV 2 was introduced a while ago. This device is a newer model of the virtual reality device that was previously released and will be available for the P

BingMag.com More information has been released about the Xbox Streaming console gadget

There have been rumors for several years about a low-cost console focusing on cloud gaming by Microsoft. Almost the same thing as Chromecast and Stadia. The first mention of it was the Hobart project.