faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Remakes are currently causing quite a stir in the gaming industry. In fact, we have been seeing more of them for several years and it is obvious that this trend will continue for the coming years. However, as is the case with any work, the development of a reconstruction does not have a specific and precise process. Different developers take different approaches based on the type of project at hand. Some decide to recreate a popular project faithfully to its original elements, and others want to change everything and create a different work. Of course, both approaches have had significant successes and failures, and obviously Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, but which one is more valuable? Which of these two needs more attention? On the other hand, which of these two do the fans want? We have recently experienced good examples of both types of reconstruction approaches, and yet the answer to this question remains unclear. Of course, if there is a correct answer. Now, in this article, we will discuss these two approaches and at the same time we will discuss some successful and failed examples of each.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Remakes are currently causing quite a stir in the gaming industry. In fact, we have been seeing more of them for several years and it is obvious that this trend will continue for the coming years. However, as is the case with any work, the development of a reconstruction does not have a specific and precise process. Different developers take different approaches based on the type of project at hand. Some decide to recreate a popular project faithfully to its original elements, and others want to change everything and create a different work. Of course, both approaches have had significant successes and failures, and obviously Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, but which one is more valuable? Which of these two needs more attention? On the other hand, which of these two do the fans want? We have recently experienced good examples of both types of reconstruction approaches, and yet the answer to this question remains unclear. Of course, if there is a correct answer. Now, in this article, we will discuss these two approaches and at the same time we will discuss some successful and failed examples of each.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Faithful reproduction

When it comes to a conservative and faithful reproduction of the original work, the advantage is immediately apparent. Simply put, a project that relies more on its source is not taking too much risk. In this approach, the reconstruction has a very strong and solid foundation that has already been established. In fact, the game systems and mechanics are defined, the story is written and ready to be told, and the development team can focus on improving existing ideas instead of implementing new ones. Of course, this does not mean that these types of reconstructions are easy to develop, but with a predetermined framework to refer to, they are definitely less risky.

On the other hand, in this type of reconstruction, when Speaking of critical and player reception, much less risk threatens the game. If a remake more or less recreates a popular work, it's assumed that the story or gameplay is still good enough to enjoy. Of course, the reconstruction in this case completely depends on the quality of the original game. For example, the remake version of Destroy All Humans, despite being fun, you can see a kind of oldness in its design.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Over the past few years, we've seen remakes that mostly stick to the original game and enjoy a lot of artistic and commercial success. Remakes of games like Demon's Souls, Shadow of the Colossus, and The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening all completely improved the visuals of their originals and gave them a polished look, but in terms of gameplay, there were very few changes. However, these few changes in the mentioned section did not end up at their detriment.

Major Rebuild with Many Changes

However, nowadays, rebuilders who decide to use much of the source Don't go away on their own, they are criticized simply because they are no longer very attractive. As consumers of video games, we gamers are always looking for new and exciting experiences, so even if we're playing a remake of a well-known classic, we won't enjoy it as much if we know it hasn't changed much. The restoration of Last of Ace 1 has also faced such conditions. While many criticisms have been made about the price of the game, many have pointed out the lack of changes.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

On the other hand, the remakes that have many changes compared to the original version, of course, while maintaining the basic elements, although they may have more risk for the manufacturing companies, but if they are well developed, they will be a huge success than the remakes that are in mentioned above, will have The remake of Resident Evil 2 is the most complete and clear example of this. Capcom decided that instead of a simple update of the original game, they completely changed it to the point where it was almost a completely new game, and it was a risk that finally paid off.

Square Enix also Similarly, he took an even bigger risk with Final Fantasy VII. Millions upon millions of fans of the game would have been happy with just a simple remake that improved the look and gameplay while still telling the same story. However, the company decided to produce a sequel that changed everything we knew about the original.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Of course, important issues are also involved in this type of reconstruction. For example, deciding what should be changed, removed, or added to the game is by no means easy, and as in the remake We saw Resident Evil 3 in 2020, if the right decisions are not taken in this regard, it may cause a big failure for the game. Also, making different changes requires more work and resources in the game development process, and many ideas must be examined and tested.

Summary

In the future, there will be many reconstructions, such as the reconstruction of Max. Pin 1 and 2, Resident Evil 4, Dead Space, etc. will be released. Let's say that despite the profitability of remakes, there are many rumors such as the remake of Metal Gear Solid 3 and other games, and it seems that in the next few years we are going to see more of them than ever before. In any case, companies will take both of the mentioned approaches and we will probably see many successes and failures.

So it is clear that there is no definite answer as to which style of reconstruction is better, because in Ultimately, it all depends on how the project is implemented. But is it more exciting to make radical changes and add new elements? It certainly is, especially when implemented by a skilled developer. However, there is no reason to condemn a faithful reconstruction either.

BingMag.com faithful remake of the game vs. major remake; which one is better?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.