Why don’t all characters in a movie need to be lovable and tangible?

Storytelling is impossible without different characters. By advancing the plot, they are an inseparable part of a narrative and make the audience connect with the story. Relating to a character or plight draws viewers in and is an important part of what writers rely on. Now add to this the glamorous set design, amazing cinematography and most importantly the acceptable performance of the actors to ensure the success of a movie.

BingMag.com Why don’t all characters in a movie need to be lovable and tangible?

Storytelling is impossible without different characters. By advancing the plot, they are an inseparable part of a narrative and make the audience connect with the story. Relating to a character or plight draws viewers in and is an important part of what writers rely on. Now add to this the glamorous set design, amazing cinematography and most importantly the acceptable performance of the actors to ensure the success of a movie.

Lovely characters attract more audiences to a movie and This reception also encourages studios to make movie sequels and their spins. For example, the series "Obi-Wan Kenobi" (Obi-Wan Kenobi) and "Loki" (Loki) are centered around prominent characters that the audience likes and can relate to well. However, some directors like Martin Scorsese are more inclined to make darker character-driven films that focus on compelling and unique character stories, where people aren't necessarily "likable". are made and in the course of real life we sometimes come across people whom we may not like at all and we cannot even tolerate them for a moment, movies follow exactly the same process. Sometimes, while watching a movie, we realize that we don't like a certain character, but it doesn't mean that he doesn't have a unique place in the story. In fact, we don't need to like all the characters in a movie or to be tangible to us, but they should follow the purpose that is specified for them in the story. All characters must have characteristics that are needed for the story; Therefore, as long as their presence does not seem pointless and there is a purpose behind it, they are necessary for the narrative and without them the story does not move forward.

  • The Dark Knight; 10 things you don't know about Heath Ledger's Joker

What qualities should a good anti-hero have?

BingMag.com Why don’t all characters in a movie need to be lovable and tangible?

Usually the most hated character in a movie is its anti-hero. God's anti-hero always prevents the protagonist from reaching his main goal and is usually the most annoying thing that we can dislike and in many moments wish for his death to come as soon as possible. However, many anti-heroes in the history of cinema are not necessarily hateful. A good story should take the audience on a journey, and a good villain is exactly the one who can save this exciting journey from a dead end.

To clarify the story, we compare the principles of story writing with the rules of wrestling. First, we will examine two terms in this exciting sport. "Baby-face" (baby-face) is a modification that refers to wrestlers who wrestle in a fair manner and somehow have a positive face among the public. For example, WWE legend John Cena is one of the most popular figures in this industry, who not only has a good image among wrestling fans, but has also been active in many charitable works. "Baby-faces" and the message they have on board can be considered as the principles that a good protagonist should take to attract the attention of the audience.

On the other hand, a term like There is the name "heel", which is exactly the opposite of "baby-face" in wrestling; In order to achieve their goals, these wrestlers do not stop from all kinds of bragging to any cowardly work they can do, and they basically believe that the end justifies the means. Dwayne Johnson, or the Rock, was one of these "heels" who, ironically, like John Cena, his acting talent was also discovered, and now he has a special place in Hollywood. They boo him, he grows up and can completely own the show with his greedy speeches and mischief and draw all the attention from "Baby-Face" to himself. Now the same thing can happen to a first class movie villain; They may do something terrible and we have a guard against them, but in any case, we cannot help but admire their intelligence and eloquence in our hearts; So we look forward to their active presence in the story. Sometimes it even goes so far that a villain becomes a better character than the protagonist.

When villainous actions are justified to the audience

BingMag.com Why don’t all characters in a movie need to be lovable and tangible?

Some stories introduce anti-heroes who aren't necessarily likeable, but we understand them and their villainous actions are somehow justified. We may not agree with their way of life but we know how they got to this point. For example, Thanos is one of these justifiable and understandable villains who can be lovable at times.

This is completely the opposite of Joffrey's character in the popular "Game of Thrones" series. Without Shek is one of the most hated characters in the history of television. We hated him and breathed a sigh of relief at his heartbreaking death. This feeling arose because there was no justification for any of his evil deeds. However, as we mentioned before, since a certain goal was set for his presence in the story and he achieved that goal, he was definitely necessary in the story, even if a wide range of audiences did not like him.

On the other side, Cersei Lannister, with an impressive performance by Lena Headey, was hated as much as her prodigal son Joffrey, but the thing about her is that although she is terrible, everything she does can be justified. did In part of the first season and the conversation with Ned Stark, we found out why Cersei acts so terribly. You may be wondering if his past justifies these actions. Not necessarily, but at least we understand why he does these brutal things. Even many viewers could understand the battle that Cersei had gone through and the effort she was making for the future of her children.

Lena Headey, despite her excellent performance as Cersei, never won an Emmy and many viewers were left with no idea. They were surprised that he was taken; Because the villain he created in "Game of Thrones" was very morally dynamic. Anti-heroes like Cersei are usually one of the best characters in the movie; Because if we were to walk in their shoes and walk in their footsteps, we can't deny the fact that we might make the same choices. It would be a shame if we don't mention another anti-hero named Jaime Lannister, played impressively by Nicola Caster-Waldo. In the first season, Jimmy was one of the most hated characters in the story and none of his actions had a logical or moral justification, but from the second season, he gradually showed positive aspects of his character to the audience and by realizing that he made many brutal decisions in his life because of love. He takes Cersei madly, to some extent it became justifiable to the audience. Especially after the end of his beautiful relationship with Brienne Tarth, in the last seasons, he became one of the most popular and ironically lovable characters of "Game of Thrones".

  • 11 intelligent characters of Game of Thrones and the bed; #1 will surprise you!

Harry Potter Dolores Umbridge style despicable villains

BingMag.com Why don’t all characters in a movie need to be lovable and tangible?

Dolores Umbridge's turn is one of the worst villains introduced to the audience from the "Harry Potter" franchise. Umbridge, played by the amazing Imelda Stanton, first appeared in the fifth part of this series, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix". Audiences absolutely hated this school principal and his evil actions are still debated.

Dolores Umbridge is certainly one of the best villains in the history of cinema; Because there are many discussions about its performance at the global level. He's one of those anti-heroes who has no justification behind his actions, and as the epitome of pure evil, he has nothing to make him even remotely likable, but what is the reason he's done so well?

The reason is that Dolores Umbridge was well received by the audience is that we all know someone like her in our lives. We all know at least one person who seems to enjoy nothing more than spreading hatred and filling the world with evil, and we know very well how horrible they are. Although Amrich is hidden behind a fake smile and a beautiful pink hat, he is inherently evil and hateful.

Jason Carver played by Mason Dye is a new character who has the same hatred as Dolores Umbridge in "Stranger Things". received from the audience. Although Carver has his own justifications, they are weak at best. He is nothing more than a bully hiding behind his popularity. Like Umbridge, Carver uses his position and popularity to create fear and destruction in the people around him. In any case, although they are terrible characters who have no justification for their actions, but because they follow the goal defined for them in the story, their presence is necessary.

The goal of the authors. It is to make even the most fantastical worlds seem somewhat believable and real. One of the best ways to achieve this goal is to create multi-dimensional characters, but on the other hand, a black horse always stands out among the rest of the herd; So the ability of some villains to be hateful makes them a constant theme and reminds us of people we don't want to be like. These characters are kind of caricatures of some of the people in society that they all run away from.

The same goes for the heroes, they rely on villains and anti-heroes to help them grow and excel during their journey. ; Therefore, hateful and intangible characters are an inseparable part of every good story.

Source: movieweb

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.