Home > Art and cinema > Movies and series
Reading time estimate: 2 min

Marvel Studios sues for Iron Man, Spider-Man and Avengers rights

BingMag.com Marvel Studios sues for Iron Man, Spider-Man and Avengers rights

Marvel is suing the heirs of some of his most prominent character creators in an effort to protect the rights of characters such as Spider-Man, Iron Man, and the Avengers.

In the last two decades, the company's biggest heroes have gone from comic book characters to popular superstars and a kind of supreme force in the Marvel universe. However, despite Marvel's recent success, its characters are still subject to copyright law. Under the law, creators or their families can reclaim the characters' property rights after a certain period of time agreed upon.
  • Why does Shang Chi's film have such bad computer special effects?
  • >
  • Why did Marvel take 20 years to make Shanghai Chi?
  • What do critics say about Shang Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings?

In general The comic writer has given the right to use his characters to the company he works for, but after a few years, the law allows them to terminate the contract so that the ownership of the characters can be returned at the request of the creators or heirs. A successful termination means that the company will lose the right to use the character or story. This legal period for some of Marvel's main characters is almost over, and the company is trying to protect the rights to use Iron Man, Spider-Man, Hockey, Black Widow, Dr. Strange and other characters through legal action. According to The Hollywood Reporter, it has filed five separate lawsuits against the heirs and legal owners of past creators, including Stan Lee, Jane Colan and Steve Ditko. The lawsuit alleges that all of these individuals were hired and that their right to return to their creators was not legal. If Marvel fails in its attempt, it may lose ownership of some of its greatest characters in less than two years.

BingMag.com Marvel Studios sues for Iron Man, Spider-Man and Avengers rights Marvel's complaints came exactly one month after the filing of Ditco's legal owner for Spider-Man, which will take place in June 2023. Mark Tubrov, a prominent lawyer who previously represented Superman creators in similar cases against Dickey comics, will represent Ditko. While Dan Petrocelli, who successfully defended in the same case, will represent Marvel in the case. Past records show that Marvel has the upper hand in law this time as well.

Tubrov's lawyer in similar cases was Jack Kirby in 2013, but in the end Marvel won because the court ruled that Kirby was one of his characters. Has rented. In short, comic book companies have often succeeded in retaining ownership of their characters, but that does not mean that Marvel will definitely win this case. Given that Spider-Man, Iron Man and many other Avengers are in balance, the process and outcome of these cases will definitely be very interesting.


Source: screenrant

READ NEXT IN: art and cinema / movies and series

BingMag.com Top 15 films of the 60's that changed popular culture movies and series

Cinema is one of the media mediums that has a great impact on popular culture. Although every year and every decade has its own influential films of its time, cinema and other artistic fields of the s

BingMag.com Combined game series review; Fun and spectacular movies and series

After "Platform" (Galter Gaztelo Orutia - 2019) and "Engel" (Bong Joon Ho - 2019), "Composite Game" is the third The most important work of the last two or three years is the world of cinema and telev

BingMag.com 15 beautiful and impressive scenes of Pixar animations that stay in your mind movies and series

In this article, we have named 15 impressive and emotional scenes of Pixar animations that sometimes make you cry out of enthusiasm or nostalgia, sometimes you strongly. They make you laugh and someti

BingMag.com Everything we know about Edgar Wright's Soho movie last night movies and series

Nightmare or alternating reality? It's hard to say, especially if you were so engrossed in the glamor of the '60s that you had no idea what was real and what was illusory. That's why you have to be ca