All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

Recently, the film "Answer No" directed by Jordan Peele has become available. During this time, there have been many discussions about the film, and some have praised the efforts of the filmmaker to show the magic of cinema, while others have been confused by the mixing of different genres and themes. Some have considered the current feeling between the characters as the strength of the work, and some have evaluated their behavior outside the framework of logic. These zero and one hundred encounters are generally formed around movies that have something to say and can cause various discussions between moviegoers. This issue shows the importance of the film in this day and age; Like it or not, we cannot ignore this importance. Due to the importance of Jordan Peele's cinema, we have looked at his not so long career and put all his works under the microscope. They need time to reach and understand the nuances of directing. They only get the necessary knowledge and experience to implement their ideas after making a few films, and that's when you can see their potential. But in his third film, Jordan Peele has shown such mastery that he has as much experience in different films as Do Jane. To understand this, it is enough to compare the atmosphere and the budget of "The Negative Answer" with his two previous films to understand how he managed to manage a film with a detailed production team and a full production.

BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

Recently, the film "Answer No" directed by Jordan Peele has become available. During this time, there have been many discussions about the film, and some have praised the efforts of the filmmaker to show the magic of cinema, while others have been confused by the mixing of different genres and themes. Some have considered the current feeling between the characters as the strength of the work, and some have evaluated their behavior outside the framework of logic. These zero and one hundred encounters are generally formed around movies that have something to say and can cause various discussions between moviegoers. This issue shows the importance of the film in this day and age; Like it or not, we cannot ignore this importance. Due to the importance of Jordan Peele's cinema, we have looked at his not so long career and put all his works under the microscope. They need time to reach and understand the nuances of directing. They only get the necessary knowledge and experience to implement their ideas after making a few films, and that's when you can see their potential. But in his third film, Jordan Peele has shown such mastery that he has as much experience in different films as Do Jane. To understand this, it is enough to compare the atmosphere and the budget of "The Negative Answer" with his two previous films to understand how he managed to manage a film with a detailed production team and a full production.

After leaving TV and before this movie, Jordan Peele decided to reveal the appearance of a society that showed itself to be deeply progressive and forward, but inside, nothing has changed and only in hiding. The lags and dirt inside it have been mastered. In these films, the important issue of racism of the pretending white American society was criticized, which uses any means to cling to its false beliefs with both hands and continue to use the pollen of black people. Its purpose is to repel the hidden ugliness of society, it pours in the form of horror cinema to increase its impact and make us disgusted by what we have seen after the film is over. This is the right strategy to show the tragedy under the skin of the city in his works. Because he didn't give any ransom to the audience and openly put the nature of the hypocritical society in front of his eyes. But in his new film, he has another idea in mind; Here, he seeks to find a way to express the passion and excitement of filmmaking and create a work in praise of cinema and its history.

Jordan Peel has only made three feature films so far. With the first two films, he showed that he can be an important director in horror cinema, and by making the third film, he revealed his technical ability and was able to create a work that can only be realized within the framework of the power of cinema. Some thought that Jordan Peele, if he sticks to the horror genre and continues to make horror films, could find a place for himself among the gods of the horror genre, alongside the greats like George Romero, Wes Craven or John Carpenter. Such an achievement is not small for any director and can make his name last in the history of cinema. But by making the third film, he showed that he has other dreams in his head and wants to be known as an all-round director.

It is interesting that when we look at Jordan Peele's acting career and go back to the previous years, We are reaching a period when he was mostly known as a comedy actor on television and there is no news of horror works, even his first movie in the world of cinema, "Keano" comes from the same era and has its roots in his television works. It is in such a framework that putting together these two different periods of the activity of an opposing head seems a bit difficult and causes the audience to get confused in dealing with his career; It's as if we are dealing with two completely different people who have completely different careers.

But there is a similarity between his works that you can recognize the line of a specific intellectual stream in the middle; Both in his comedy works and in his films, Jordan Peele always deals with issues such as stepping into the era of responsibility and the beginning of an identity crisis. As the films in the list below show, the issue of identity crisis is a fundamental issue for him. It is true that in his works this crisis is associated with other difficulties such as ethnic and racism issues and in the latter the issue of entering the world of adulthood after the death of his father. He saw the effect of not knowing his place among his lover's family; Even before the start of the current madness and horror in the film. On the other hand, it seems that Jordan Peele, unlike many directors of the horror genre today, does not run away from the stereotypes of this genre and enjoys using them. Unlike many, he does not seek to make completely different films, but also welcomes the correct use of clichs.

Film number 5 of this list is It dates back to before Jordan Peele's first feature film, when he had just moved from television to film and was still writing and acting rather than directing. For this reason, his name as the author is mentioned under the title of the film. Movie number 4 is related to the time when he made a name for himself as a director and creator of horror cinema, and now he was writing and experimenting in this genre. Since we decided to review the entire film career of this important director these days, it was not easy to pass by these two films, because both works are important films to understand the path that Jordan Peele has taken over the years. has done.

5. Keanu

BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

  • Director: Peter Atencio li>
  • Writers: Jordan Peele, Alex Rubens
  • Stars: Jordan Peele, Keegan Michael Kay and Tiffany Haddish
  • Product: 2016, USA
  • IMDb site rating for the movie: 6.2 out of 10
  • Movie rating On Rotten Tomatoes site: 78%

Years before "Get Out", "Us" and "No" there was a series in America called "Peel and Kay". had Jordan Peele starred alongside Keegan Michael Kay in this series and Peter Atencio was the director. This comedy series was broadcasted in five seasons between 2012 and 2015 and it gained a lot of fans. But regardless of the success of the series, Jordan Peele has shown what a vengeful Dastagoy he is during his career on television. As a writer, he was always present with others and sometimes he even visited the elements of the horror genre and in the world of comedy, he was busy with its stereotypes.

As soon as the series ended, he was with Michael Kay and Atencio were appointed to continue the story of the two main characters of that TV series in a movie. This is a common thing in America and sometimes the story of successful series continues in movies with the same mood so that the fans of the series can enjoy seeing their favorite characters on the screen. Although this issue is a little bit in the taste and the greed of Hollywood people to pocket more money. In any case, no matter what the result is and no matter how you interpret this event, a man was added to Hollywood from the heart of the movie "Keanu", who is definitely one of the best talents of his generation in the cinema today.

Even in the first film, you can clearly see how the creators, while showing a comedy sequence, go into the mood of the horror genre, and at the end of the same sequence, they turn to action cinema. Such an ability is not rare among filmmakers of Jordan Peele's generation, but it rarely pleases such an audience. In terms of genre, the movie "Keano" can be classified under the two friends genre. The two friends genre has been a popular genre in American cinema for a long time and it draws audiences to the cinemas. In this genre, two people who are usually busy, awkward and full of differences come together on a winding path and face problems. Another feature of this genre is the presence of a comedic tone and atmosphere during the drama, which is caused by the same differences and the strange path that the two characters take. There are two main characters. What happened at the same time as the "Peel and Kay" series was made, and the creators of this new work did not see the need to work on it much. The story of the movie is also a funny story. This funnyness first comes from the great idea of Keanu Reeves talking in the role of a cat named Keanu, and then due to the ability of the two actors to bring the audience together, the main idea expands and makes the audience have a good time watching the movie.

"A cat named Keanu is stolen by unknown people. Peel and Kay are very fond of this cat. These two clumsy people decide to get their cat back and for that reason they set themselves up as professional criminals. until..."

4. Candyman

BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

  • Director: Nia DaCosta
  • Writers: Jordan Peele, Wayne Rosenfeld and Nia DaCosta
  • Stars: Yahya Abdulmatin II, Tiona Paris and Nathan Stewart John
  • Product: 2021, USA and Canada
  • IMDb rating for the movie: 5.9 out of 10
  • Film score on Rotten Tomatoes site: 84%

In 1992, Bernard Rose made a slasher film of the same name, which has now become a classic among horror films. has been The story of that film was based on a local legend and the protagonist was a woman in the center who, in her struggle to understand the happenings of a poor neighborhood in Chicago, gets to know the beliefs of the people there and finally loses everything on this issue. That film openly dealt with the issue of racial discrimination in America and showed this issue in a span of a hundred years. As if nothing had changed in a century and still Black people were the victims of white people's ignorance and racism.

So it is natural that Jordan Peele is interested in this movie; Because it is both scary and concerns similar to his concerns are hidden in the fabric of the film. This interest continues to the point that the director of this new film, Nia DaCosta, revealed at the time of the film's release that if it had not been for the work of Bernard Rose, Jordan Peele would probably never have gone to a film like "Get Out". If you've seen both movies, you'll agree that there are many thematic affinities between Bernard Rose's Candyman and Get Out. Now, years after that film, just when Peele's name has become a famous name in Hollywood, he goes to the sequel of this work to pay full respect to his beloved film and leave no stone unturned.

Jordan Peel and DaCosta have updated the story of the old film. Here, the painting is placed in the frame of the filmmaker, who enters a strange place in search of the source of inspiration. From now on, this man, along with his friend, is exposed to a danger that he does not know about. Just like the 1992 film, the story of the film takes place in a space between the melancholic world of people trapped by a supernatural being and the crimes of a dangerous killer. The filmmaker has managed to make the audience feel that there is no supernatural element in the drama so that the audience doubts everything. It is in such a framework that he can turn over his winning card, which occurs in the final chapter of the film; Where the audience doubts all the images in the film and stands next to those who seem to be innocent.

This is where the racist beliefs are introduced to the film. Instead of the film, the poor neighborhood of the city is referred to as the "neighborhood of the black skins" and the filmmaker even goes further and goes as far as to openly point out that the lives of black people are not important to white people, but they are stones for their own race. They finish Doesn't all this remind you of Jordan Peele's movies and the story of the movies "Get Out" and "Us"? The only difference is that the movie "Candy Man" narrates the story of a black murderous spirit who has killed more than 100 others and took revenge.

"30 years have passed since the story of the first movie. Together with his girlfriend, who is an art gallery manager, Anthony goes to the poor neighborhood where the events of the first film take place in order to find subjects for his paintings. He accidentally enters the place where the candy man or the legendary killer was killed. This strange place makes Anthony curious about the life of the candy man; The same man who has been busy killing others with a rake for years..."

3. Nope

BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

  • Director: Jordan Peele
  • Stars: Daniel Kaluuya, Keke Palmer and Steven Yeon
  • Product: 2022, USA
  • IMDb site rating for the movie: 7 out of 10
  • Rotten Tomatoes site rating for the movie: 82%

Jordan After success with the films "Get Out" and "Us", Peele has left some things from that era and kept some things in this new work. The heroes of his drama are still people of color, and the historical oppression against them is also mentioned in the transition of the film. Especially when the filmmaker in this new work emphasizes the place of the famous moving image of Edward Muybridge in that two-minute work of the 19th century and considers the forgetting of the name of the black horseman in the work to be the result of this historical injustice.

But relative There is nothing similar to the previous works of the filmmaker. For example, there are no horror stories and there are no violent characters who commit crimes. The cause of death and terror is an unearthly and inhuman factor, whose actions are not portrayed with violence. Unlike the stories of the past, this death show can be interpreted as other things that have nothing to do with the world of horror cinema; For example, deaths that tend to disappear can be interpreted as the disappearance of old filmmaking methods or the dissolution of the audience in the world of cinema; Because that gigantic creature, especially at the end of the film, is something similar to a video camera or a movie projector. From the family job of the boy and girl to the farm where they live and obviously remember the location of western movies. brings. From the job of a hybrid man in the same neighborhood to a story that refers to a sitcom series in the past. All of this is the filmmaker's tribute to the world that has made moving images for us for years; The same world that started with Edward Muybridge's two-minute picture started in the second half of the 19th century.

But this tribute to the history of cinema is also present in the fabric of the work. For this, the filmmaker mixes the stereotypes of three genres. The first of them is the science fiction genre. You can clearly see the traces of science fiction films of the 1970s and 1960s. From a masterpiece like Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters Of Third Kind" to a more recent film like JJ Abrams' "Super 8".

But the spaceship or alien The actor in the movie reminds the audience of horror movies with his actions. He gets hungry and takes a sacrifice. The director also does not shy away from showing the horror in the frame during the night scenes or when he is on top of the main characters' house. But like his older films, the violence in this show is not reckless and acts more controlled. Both the location of the film and the horses are borrowed from western cinema, and the final sequence with the protagonist riding a horse refers to the heroes of western cinema. Besides, the riding of a black man in front of the camera of a famous cameraman is a response to the anonymity of the black horse rider Edward Muybridge, whose name is lost in the dust of history and no one knows him. The movie is fantasy and dream. Like the greats like Spielberg, the director has turned his dreams into a story that is supposed to answer his inner desires and be a tribute to the things that have influenced him. This is a common work in American cinema; But only directors who have reached a high position get the chance to do it. So, we can be sure that Jordan Peele has entered the Hollywood Hall of Fame.

"A boy named after him. Along with his father, Jay owns a horse training farm for movies. One day, while taming a rebellious horse, the father was hit by coins that rained down from the sky. The son quickly takes the father to the hospital, but he dies. Six months have passed since then and the boy is not in a good financial situation and has to sell his horses to a man in the same neighborhood who runs a circus. But one night one of the horses gets lost and he. Jay feels that there is something in the sky that has kidnapped him

2. Us (Us)

BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

  • Director: Jordan Peele li>
  • Actors: Lupita Nyong'o, Winston Duke and Elisabeth Moss
  • Production: 2019, USA
  • But the film "Ma" showed that the success of the first film It didn't happen and now we can call something called Jordan Peele cinema. Because he put all the elements of the first film in a new container and made a work that obviously has the signs of the first film and tried to expand that violent world. Here again, the victims of the story were the same black men and women who are trapped in a world full of misunderstanding and cruelty, but they can no longer bear to play the role of the victim.

    From this point of view "Us" is a step forward for Jordan Peele and signals that he is not going to stand still. In the movie "Ma", choosing the negative pole and the positive pole of the story is a bit more complicated than the previous film, and the director sets up a more complicated moral world. Although this one is not as successful as "Get Out" in evoking the emotions of the audience, it is an attempt to move forward and make a work that, while representing the director's concerns, is also technically different.

    Furthermore, by making his second film, Jordan Peele has shown that the issue of inequalities and discrimination is very serious for him and, like the first film, he does not try to give discounts to his audience in showing it. The crazy narrative of the night attack of some outcasts on the home of wealthy people who are busy with their own pleasures regardless of the ugliness of the world is scary enough, now draw an aura of mystery around the events of the story to realize that you are on the side of a smart movie. . Using the stereotypes of the slasher genre, along with dealing with the behavior of the attackers who are themselves victims, creates excitement and tension, but the director is still not satisfied with this and has other ideas in his head. has it. He tries to connect these elements to a mental space and of course also touch on other social issues, which becomes the Achilles heel of the film and puts it one step behind "Get Out".

    Jordan Peel knows that in order to change a society and leave racial discrimination behind, you must first face its bitter consequences with all your heart. For this reason, in his film, he recklessly tells the audience about the consequences of continuing this situation and actually warns them. But all these concepts make sense when there is an entertaining movie first, which has actually happened.

    "1968. A girl goes to the beach with her family to spend her vacation. In a room, he meets another girl who looks very much like him and seems to be his twin. Years pass and the girl grows up and now goes on vacation with her family. But his family is attacked at night by people who are very similar to them..."

    1. Brobyron (Get Out)

    BingMag.com All No Answer director Jordan Peele’s movies, from worst to best (filmmaker under the microscope)

    • Director: Jordan Peele
    • Actors: Daniel Kaluuya, Alison Williams and Bradley Whiteford
    • Product: 2017, USA
    • IMDb site rating for the movie: 7.7 out of 10
    • Rotten Tomatoes site rating for the movie: 98%

    The story of Jordan Peele's film reveals the appearances of a society that shows itself to be deeply progressive and forward, but inside, nothing has changed and only in hiding. The lags and dirt inside it have been mastered. Here, this important issue of racism of the pretentious white American society is criticized, which uses any means to cling to its false beliefs. The negative characters of the story are no longer those men and women who openly commit crimes against black people. In the past, you could at least see a difference between a racist person and someone else and distinguish them quickly, but in the new world, new masks have been placed on the faces of these people. Read the story for a moment and imagine that you are in the place of the main character; can you trust anyone else if you are saved from that hellish place? It is the inability to recognize danger and the inability to recognize the nature of people that puts the movie "Get Out" in this position.

    They have reached such a level of maturity that they have managed to maintain their image in the society and even be recognized as privileged and cultured people, and it is the bad luck of the main character of the film that he is caught by such a monster. False beliefs and an ugly view of life have made these people so blind and deaf that they mock even a sacred concept like love and use it as their toy to achieve their goals.

    It was said that Jordan Peele put his story, which aims to reject the hidden ugliness of society, in the form of horror cinema to increase its impact and make us disgusted by what we have seen after finishing the film, and this is the right strategy to show the evil under the skin of the city. Is; Because it doesn't pay anything to the audience and exposes the essence of the hypocritical society in front of the audience's eyes. The ugliness of the black man or the stupidity of the black man in believing in a false love, neither alone is the main cause of horror in the film. What is next to these things and makes the film scary from the beginning to the end is the careful styling of Jordan Peele as a director. His camera is restless at every moment and in every shot, and the mise-en-scne is arranged in such a way as if there is a danger lurking in every corner of that apparently clean and beautiful house. This technical ability made moviegoers immediately count down the minutes for Jordan Peele's next movie to be made.

    "Chris is a black man who goes to a villa on the outskirts of the city with his white fiancee to meet her parents." . A luxurious party is about to be held there and Chris is one of the guests of honor there. Everyone treats him well at first, and Chris is happy that his fiance has such a privileged family, but nothing is as he thinks..."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.