10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

After the 1970s saw the rise of blockbuster sequels, the 1980s were filled with sequels popping up like mushrooms just to fill pockets. The owners of the films were made. It was at the same time that cinema critics opposed such films and declared that a film like "The Godfather: Part Two" was made for artistic reasons and completed the fictional world of the first part, while that the existence of these sequels has no justification except to pocket more money, because both the characters have been completed in the first part and the story is complete. The first film's fluff was gone and there was nothing new to cover, but not all sequels were like that. In this list, we have introduced 10 movie sequels of the 1980s that are worth watching and will provide a good time for the audience.

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

After the 1970s saw the rise of blockbuster sequels, the 1980s were filled with sequels popping up like mushrooms just to fill pockets. The owners of the films were made. It was at the same time that cinema critics opposed such films and declared that a film like "The Godfather: Part Two" was made for artistic reasons and completed the fictional world of the first part, while that the existence of these sequels has no justification except to pocket more money, because both the characters have been completed in the first part and the story is complete. The first film's fluff was gone and there was nothing new to cover, but not all sequels were like that. In this list, we have introduced 10 movie sequels of the 1980s that are worth watching and will provide a good time for the audience.

  • 16 best action movies of the 1980s from worst to best
  • 15 scary movies of the 80s that you must watch

In the cinema, sequels are considered successful that either have new ideas to face or expand the ideas of the first movie and new ways. to go In this way, they can not only create a self-sufficient world, but also be judged as an independent film. But it is possible to make a movie that is completely dependent on the first work, but make it enjoyable for the fans of the previous movie. A film like "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Death" or "Lethal Weapon 2" are exactly such films and they delight their target audience. , has become a rule, but this does not mean that all such films are worthless. If we skip the exceptions where the second or third films are better than the first films (works like "Mission Impossible", for example), in many cases we come across sequels that are at least entertaining. This issue comes from the nature of American cinema, which is very capable in storytelling and knows that it is necessary to tell a standard story in order to attract the audience and make them want to watch the sequel of their popular films. There were sequels such as "Aliens" or "Evil Dead 2" that were appreciated and sat at the top, but some films did not get their natural right due to the harsh criticism of the critics of the pervasiveness of the sequel-making process. Decades had to pass before they were discovered in the re-reviews of these films and found the place they deserved.

10. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director: Steven Spielberg
  • Stars: Herson Ford, Kate Hopshaw
  • Product: 1984, USA
  • IMDb site rating for the movie: 7.5 out of 10
  • Rotten Tomatoes site rating for the movie: 83%

This is the second movie from the series of "Indiana Jones" movies and actually a prequel to the first movie, "Raiders of the Lost Ark". The first film of the series was able to attract both the critics and the general audience, but this one, although it was successful at the box office, was not taken seriously by the critics. Although the opinion of newer critics has improved a little, it is still not comparable to the success of the first film.

Harrison Ford's success in the role of Han Solo in the movie "Star Wars" laid the foundation for the creation of the character of Indiana Jones in the heart of a story. The adventure was separated to create a series of films that both challenged the imagination of adults and that children could easily relate to. But the problem of this second version is the same problem that the sequel films are facing; The fact that they are mostly made for conquering the box office and sometimes they can't expand the ideas of the first movie and they stop at the level of the same ideas.

But is the situation really so bad that you can't "Indiana Jones" Did you consider "And the Temple of Death" to be a good movie or at least watch it? If our criterion is the first film of this franchise and we are not willing to fall short of this position, the answer to the question will definitely be a resounding yes. But if we don't take it hard and know that a director like Steven Spielberg knows his job well, which is storytelling, and producer George Lucas knows how to turn a project around, then we will come across a good movie that is not only worth watching.

The movie "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Death" is important in the history of cinema in another way; It was this movie that made the PG-13 age rating enter the age rating system of American cinema; Because some of its scenes were considered too violent for children. In 2003 The character of Indiana Jones was chosen by the American Film Foundation as the second best character of all time. All these things are enough to be a reason to watch the movie as soon as possible.

"Indiana Jones, who wants to trade an ancient object, enters China to make a deal with a Chinese gangster. But the deal goes wrong and he is forced to run away from Mr. Gangster along with a Chinese woman and a boy. They escape from China by hijacking the other party's plane, but in the middle of the way, the plane runs out of gas and crashes. Indiana Jones and his companions have landed in the country of India and near a village whose people have been captured by people from an evil cult. They want Indiana Jones to retrieve the villager's magic stone from the cult. But...

9. Friday the 13th: the final chapter

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director: Joseph Zito Starring: Kimberly Beck, Peter Burton and Corey Feldman Product: 1984 America
  • IMDb site rating for the movie: 6 out of 10
  • Rotten Tomatoes site rating for the movie: 22%

"Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter" was the fourth film in the "Friday the 13th" series of horror films, which, unlike the previous films, was neither taken seriously by critics nor liked by the audience. Although its acceptable sales due to the low budget of its production made it profitable and this franchise continued, but its goodness did not make it get its due and be seen well.

Today, the masked killer is The movie, or Jason, is one of the symbols of horror cinema in the slasher subgenre. This series of films, which were clearly influenced by the brilliance of John Carpenter's "Halloween" movie, have many points in common with that wonderful masterpiece. The masked killer of the story, who entered this story directly from the same movie, and his killing method has similarities to that mysterious man. Just why the victims of John Carpenter's film were chosen and why they were chosen by the killer make that work a masterpiece for all seasons. lift yourself up The story of the first film of this series, like many slasher films, deals with the fate of people who are caught by a cold-blooded killer in a pure ignorance. Those who have left the city, without the possibility of help arriving, can only delay their death a little; Otherwise, sooner or later, he will be killed in a horrible way. The same process continued in the subsequent films until it was the turn of the work, that is, the film we are discussing.

In the fourth film, the filmmaker tried to act a little differently and make a change. By the way, the changes applied by him have worked and his film has become even better than other films in this series. Jason, the symbolic killer of the movie, is much scarier here than in other movies, especially since he seems to have superhuman strength and no one can stop him.

The scary scenes of the movie maybe It is not suitable for the faint hearted audience, but it will definitely please the fans of horror cinema. So if you are interested in slasher movies, you should not miss watching one of the best. Don't pay attention to the film's rating on critics' rating sites, even if famous critics have given these votes, you can't rely on their votes when dealing with a horror movie; Because they have never taken horror cinema seriously.

Iqbal's level of respect for the killer in the film "Friday the 13th" was so high that 12 films have been made based on his presence.

It seems that after the events of the previous episode, Jason the masked killer of the movie is seriously injured and died. But he miraculously wakes up in the morgue and escapes from death. He starts a terrible bloodbath to return to his home..."

8. Mad max: beyond thunderdome

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director : George Miller and George Egloy
  • Actors: Mel Gibson, Tina Turner and Paul Larson
  • Product: 1985, Australia
  • IMDb rating for the movie: 6.2 out of 10
  • Rating for the movie on Rotten Tomatoes: 81 %

Before George Miller made the successful movie "Mad Max: Fury Road" in America with a staggering budget and a familiar and international team, this story and He made the hero and the apocalyptic atmosphere in the late 1970s and early 1980s in his native country in the form of a trilogy. The first part of this series was released in 1979 and the narrator was a man who tries to find his way in an unfinished chaos and rely on his own strength. His monotony in an apocalyptic atmosphere touched the hearts of the audience and made Mad Max a popular anti-hero. changed. The second part of this collection was made in 1981 and it can be called the best part of this trilogy. But many did not take the third part, which is the same movie we are discussing, seriously and considered the second good movie as an unnecessary work. Although in a re-review, we realize that this time George Miller has new ideas and the theme of helping people and forgetting the past, which was present in previous films, is repeated with more violence, which gives the work a different atmosphere. In addition, the exotic atmosphere of the film has become more reckless here, and the director has no qualms about the radical display of his ideas. Directing and creating rhythm shows. By the way, this creation of space is the reason why the third movie must be taken seriously. The desert that the filmmaker draws here and puts on the screen is exactly what he perfected by making the movie "Mad Max: Fury Road". Of course, it should be noted that this last film was made in America with a much larger budget. Of course, the advancement of technology has also had an impact on the fruition of the director's ideas in the last film, but many of the ideas of this Hollywood blockbuster have been found in those compact Australian works.

George Miller in the third part of his trilogy It completes what its hero started. By accompanying the children, he recovers a part of his burnt past and reconciles with his inner turmoil. All of these things make it difficult to understand why the film has not been seen, otherwise "Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome" is a well-made work that can provide a good time for its audience, which is the first thing any good sequel should do. .

"Max, a former police officer, is exiled to the desert after the apocalypse to be killed by a terrifying goddess. But he is rescued by a group of children. This tribe, which consists only of very small and vulnerable children, is threatened by a great danger. Max is trying to solve this danger but...

7. Octopussy

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director: John Glenn li>
  • Stars: Roger Moore, Maud Adams
  • Product: 1983, UK
  • Site rating IMDb to the movie: 6.5 out of 10
  • Rating of the movie on Rotten Tomatoes site: 43%

In this list There are two James Bond movies. This is the first film on the list and Roger Moore plays James Bond here. John Glenn, who made several James Bond films, is directing it. In fact, "Octopus" is the 13th film in the series of James Bond films, and it is probably the same number that took its neck to be a little less successful than the films before and after it and to be popular with the public, if it is clearly one of the best James Bond films. It's the 1980s.

Unfortunately, Roger Moore's last few films as James Bond didn't do very well. There was no news of the humor of the first films, and neither Roger Moore himself could have the usual charisma and seduce his audience. But the movie "Octopus" is an exception among them and it is worth to be seen and discovered again.

Part of this is due to the creativity that is not found in any other James Bond film. Here, the creators are clearly missing some of the usual elements of James Bond cinema and even making fun of Sean Connery's consistent persona as the first actor to play the role of 0007. This awareness of comic situations has caused "Octopus" to find a unique quality and mock the world of spies and their inviolable ideals to serve the country and the flag and give them the color of absurdity.

So, we are on the side of a unique film that even its story tells about this uniqueness. Now, as a movie lover, are you willing to miss such a unique film, among the long list of James Bond films, many of which are similar in everything?

All the James Bonds in the history of cinema, the audience's imagination is comfortable with his ultimate superiority and is just waiting for him to use his usual charm to solve seemingly insoluble equations; Whether it is on a snow-covered mountain or in the heart of a submarine moving in the depths of the sea, he will finally overcome his enemy and the audience knows it. But here he needs the help of those who it is impossible to believe that one day James Bond will have to work with them. He is the same super spy that no one and nothing is safe from him, but now he can't even distinguish friend from enemy.

"The murder of special agent 009 causes a chain of events to occur. 007 or James Bond meets a person named Kamal Khan. He and another person named Octopus are the leaders of a group called Octopuses. Kamal Khan is apparently planning to detonate a nuclear bomb at the US Air Force Base and James Bond must stop him at all costs, even if he cooperates with a terrorist..."

6. Rocky 3 (rocky 3)

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director: Sylvester Stallone
  • Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Talia Shire and Brett Young
  • Product: 1982, USA
  • IMDb rating for the movie: 6. 2 out of 10
  • Rating of the movie on Rotten Tomatoes site: 67%

In the early 1970s, Sylvester Stallone, who had no idea And he was trying to get into the movie industry anyway, he wrote a screenplay that became the movie "Rocky 1". The story was about a boxer who had lost his whole life instead of striving for success and was considered a complete loser. Finally, the power of love and a lot of luck came to him and pulled him out of the deep swamp and brought him to the heights of success. The story was exactly based on the American dream and told the story of a man who reaches the peak of fame and success through his efforts and is admired by the society and accepts him as a role model.

In the first part, he is not yet the world champion. And the movie ends right after his fierce resistance against the world champion. Now he is a man who can own everything with self-confidence. In the second part, he finally succeeds in defeating Apollo Creed, the world champion of the first part, and also wins the title of champion. Now Rocky is a rich and famous person and can live in comfort and well-being, but a new rival is found who will do anything to win; This new competitor is even ready to get his hands dirty for the final victory and does not believe in any moral limits.

Here, the character of Rocky Balboa is struggling with a personal problem. As the world changes and a new generation is found who only think about their success, Rocky is left behind and tastes the bitter taste of defeat for the first time. But this loss did not happen on the field, but somewhere outside. But Rocky doesn't believe this and imagines that he is no longer the former boxer, and this has really messed him up. Until the head of his old friend and rival, Apollo Creed, is found, so that Rocky can find his lost pride again, stand on his own feet and enter the fighting ring.

It is quite clear that the story of the movie, It is a clichd story of a hero who gets up again, doesn't give up and fights every time he falls down. But clichs are not always bad and using them correctly can be a bonus for any movie. By the way, this happened in the movie "Rocky 3" and the audience is on the same side with the movie, which somehow takes him along with him. The sales of the film in the same year of release were good and even sold more than the previous part, but it seems that the critics did not have the patience to follow the stories of Rocky Balboa's fall and rise.

"After winning the world championship, Rocky decides to retire forever. The insistence of his wife and of course the heart disease of his good-hearted coach is the reason for this decision. But the discovery of the head and head of the brave young man turns the page. This young man intends to make a name for himself by taking on Rocky, so he provokes Rocky to not retire and accept the fight against him. Rocky accepts under the pressure of the media, but on the day of the match, his trainer has a heart attack and Rocky steps into the ring in a broken state and without spirit...

5. Lethal weapon 2 (lethal weapon 2)

BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

  • Director: Richard Donner
  • Stars: Mel Gibson, Danny Glover and Joe Pesci
  • Product: 1989, USA
  • Expectations from the movie "Lethal Weapon 2" were very high; Because the first film was not only called one of the best action films of the 1980s, but it was also considered one of the best works of the two friends genre in the entire history of cinema. Fortunately, like the first film, the second film benefits from a dynamic dynamic relationship between its two main characters, and the filmmaker is aware that this relationship made the first film such a success, otherwise, any film in Hollywood with that level of possibilities can fail. have several standard action sequences; What is important is to have empathetic characters that the audience can relate to during these action sequences and feel sorry for them or worry about their fate. and draws the audience to the cinemas. In this genre, two people, usually full of differences, come together on a tortuous path and face problems. Another characteristic of this genre is the presence of a comedic tone and atmosphere during the drama, which is caused by the same differences and the strange path that the two characters take. Now, in the "Deadly Weapon" movie series, many of these components are used in a police work, and instead of two friends with a case, we are dealing with two different policemen, even in appearance, whose combination can cause the failure of any mission.

    The most important The point in two friends' movies is that the chemistry between the two main characters works. At first glance, white Mel Gibson and black Danny Glover do not fit together, but Richard Donner can use them and their differences very well. Add to all this the numerous action sequences as well as the police theme of the film to make sure how enjoyable it is to watch this series of films. In the 1980s, he helped make Mel Gibson famous. His combination with Danny Glover made an attractive combination that made many viewers go to the cinema. In the meantime, the comedy atmosphere of the film made the whole of the two main characters take on a funny color and the audience was encouraged to watch the film more; All this made the first film of the series so famous all over the world that three sequels were made based on the presence of these two characters. In that first film, the relationship between the two main characters is created in a general way, but in the second work, the director expands these differences and goes beyond the level of disagreement over the method of police operations and reaches their view of life and how to spend it. This also makes us not face a repetitive movie.

    "Martin and Roger fail in carrying out a mission and arresting a big-headed smuggler. To punish them, the police chief puts them in charge of guarding an important FBI witness. The two of them have to dry up this witness who was responsible for the accounting of a drug cartel, but someone is planning to kill this witness. For this reason, the foot of these two detectives opens to a big case..."

    4. license to kill

    BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

    • Director: John Glen
    • Actors: Timothy Dalton, Carey Lovell
    • Product: 1989, USA and UK
    • IMDb site rating for the movie: 6.6 out of 10
    • Rotten Tomatoes site rating for the movie: 79%

    If Roger Moore had given Ian Fleming's creation a fantasy and humorous side, Timothy Dalton darkened the world of this super spy. He appeared in two films of this series, "Licence to Kill" was his second film and the sixteenth work of the series. Dalton was an actor born in the English theater, which made him refuse to accept the offer to play the role of James Bond at the age of 22 and stay focused on his theater work. Twenty years passed until luck knocked on his door again and he was in the form of James Bond.

    It was said that with the presence of Timothy Dalton, the atmosphere of James Bond movies became darker. If in the movie "The Living Daylights" the atmosphere of the work is between the humor and the snobbery of Roger Moore's works and the dark world, fortunately in "Licence to Kill" the creators of this dark world are embraced with all their heart and They have made a work of one hand. Maybe for this reason, no one was satisfied with the sale of the film at the end; Because the audience never imagined such a bitter movie with the presence of James Bond on the screen.

    According to this dark world, James Bond works more than ever, outside the direct orders of his pleasant organization and instead of serving the government, in Finding out is a personal revenge. Timothy Dalton, who was a serious fan of the works of the author of James Bond books, Ian Fleming, penetrated into the character more than all the actors before him and presented a different image of him. All of these things caused many to ignore his presence, and as a result, this was his last game as James. As a result, this popular character was archived for years and no one went to him until Pierce Brosnan's head was found and this franchise continued again.

    But is this encounter really due to weakness? was it a movie Couldn't Timothy Dalton be kept? Personally, I believe that the creators of the James Bond film series made a big mistake and after the dark world that was created with the presence of Timothy Dalton and was going to lead to the creation of lasting works, they moved towards the headless films of the Pierce Brosnan era. They were so shocked by the realism of Dalton's era and were afraid that they took refuge in the confused cinematic embrace and it marked the worst era of this character on the screen.

    Incidentally, the movie "License to Kill" is an important work among the works of James Bond. . A film that shows what dramatic capacities this character has and only a little bit of courage is needed to reveal these capacities. But unfortunately, the conservatism of the producers was so great that they did not allow these new ideas to emerge and take effect. But the same movie "License to Kill" can be a complete luxury for those who know that this enduring creature of cinema history could have been directed in a different direction and made better movies. English has been arrested. He kills Felix Leiter and his wife while escaping. Felix is a close friend of James Bond and for this reason James Bond decides to avenge his friend's death..."

    3. Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock

    BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

    • Director: Leonard Nimoy
    • Stars: William Shatner, DeForest Kelly and James Doohan
    • Product: 1984, USA
    • IMDb rating for the movie: 6.6 out of 10
    • Rating for the movie on Rotten Tomatoes: 78%

    Leonard Nimoy, who played Spock in the 1960s TV series "Star Trek", directed the third part of the movie. William Shatner, who played the role of Captain Kirk in that old series, was again in the form of the same character to make a new movie. They know history; The series that was sold to many countries of the world and created a fever all over the world in its time, and over the years, various stories were added to that original series, so that books, movies, series and even computer games were made based on that original series. to be Still, the story of Captain Kirk and his friends aboard the Enterprise continues, and neither Hollywood nor video game developers are willing to let it go. It is in such a frame that it can be claimed that no series in history has even come close to the achievements of this series.

    In 1979, the first movie of this series called "Star Trek: The motion picture) was made and was successful at the box office. The creation and success of "Star Wars" made this project get the green light and continue; Because "Star Trek" like the George Lucas series is a full-fledged space opera that has a dramatic story and a completely imaginary world that might be more suitable for the small TV screen, but George Lucas' work proved that it is not and the silver screen of John It gives for the glamorous show of life in a dream galaxy.

    In 1982, the second film of this series called "Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan" was released. It was not seen less than the first movie and was able to achieve a good success. Although the success rate of these two films did not reach the level of the "Star Wars" series, it both satisfied its old fans and caused a new generation of audiences to be attracted to the stories of the ship Enterprise.

    In 1984, Hollywood released the third part. It was released in cinemas, which unfortunately was not well received like the previous two episodes; Critics did not like it and people were not satisfied with what they saw despite buying tickets and going to the cinema. All of this led to the discovery of conversations on the phone that were going to lead to the closure of the continuation of the production of films in this franchise. "The Search for Spock" is not a bad movie at all, and at least it is a head and neck higher than the series of meaningless works that were made in the 1990s based on the same stories. Indeed, the first and second parts of this series, as well as the trilogy of "Star Wars", had raised such expectations that no one would be satisfied with less than a first-class movie. The era was the heyday of space operas, and the lovers of this world were not yet familiar with the bad movies of the next era.

    "Commander Kirk and his crew steal the ship Enterprise and return to the Genesis planet with it. Maybe he can find Spock's body..."

    2. Superman 2 (superman 2)

    BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

    • Director: Richard Lester
    • Stars: Christopher Reeve, Gene Hackman and Ned Beatty
    • Product: 1980, USA and UK
    • At one time, Superman was the most popular character among comic superheroes and people all over the world knew him. At that time, Marvel's heroes were not yet universal and were mostly known in America. DC had the upper hand in the competition between these two companies and even managed to create a television series based on Batman stories.

      In the mid-1970s, it was decided that the most popular superhero of that time would have a separate film for himself. be The "Superman" project was launched and even a great actor like Marlon Brando was appointed to participate in a short role, and Christopher Reeve was appointed to play the role of the martyr Clark Kent/Superman. The film in question was released in 1978 and quickly became a phenomenon all over the world and a lot of money flowed into the pockets of its producers. These events caused the next project based on this character to be launched immediately and ready to be shown in 1980.

      If the first film had proved to the world that superhero films can be successful and that they work, so to speak. And from this point of view, it was considered a history-making work, the second film showed that the opposite can also happen. But it is strange that the second film is a better work than the first film in terms of structure and story, but apparently the idea was not new, which caused its downfall, otherwise, on paper, everything is for the great success of the film. It was ready.

      Even today, there is still this lack of place in the film; Many have seen the first film because of its history making, but they have never seen the second one. Over the years, the world of superheroes has been mixed with big battles, complex worlds, and glamorous characters, so that the first part of "Superman" is seen according to the same values of cinema history. But if you are one of the fans of these superhero movies, you must see the second part of "Superman 2" to understand what a great gem it was and how it was forgotten over time for no reason.

      I imagine that part of this lack of visibility is The superhero movie special is coming back, even today new works like this are forgotten after a few years; Because the audience of superhero works consumes these works more instead of enjoying watching movies. For this reason, the passing of a few years, even though it is little, makes the desired film seem old to such an audience and they will not be able to find it again. Superheroes should distance themselves from this kind of view of cinema and follow the path that this world full of ups and downs has taken. By following this path, you will definitely come across one of the best superhero movies ever made, which is the movie "Superman 2". is released from captivity. Intending to take revenge, he moves to Earth with his allies to face Superman

      1. Star Wars: Return if the Jedi

      BingMag.com 10 Underrated Sequels of the 1980s; From “Mad Max 3” to “Superman 2”

      • Director: Richard Marquand
      • Stars: Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher
      • Product: 1983, America
      • IMDb rating for the movie: 8.3 out of 10
      • Rating for the movie on Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

      Perhaps it is a bit strange for you that the third film of the Star Wars series (of course, the third in terms of production date, not story priority) is on this list. You are probably thinking to yourself that how much should a film be delivered? But wait a moment and compare the popularity of this one with the popularity of the previous two films. I mention this issue because the third film is not less than the other two films, but both the audience and the critics received it less than its older brothers. "Stars" is the biggest and best space opera in the history of cinema, the other two films of this series are brilliant complements to the first film, both in terms of cinematic structure and story, and they have as much a role in the popularity of this work as that film. /p>

      The "Star Wars" trilogy was made slowly and quietly, right in the middle of a time when the bitter events of the seventies were destroying all the power of cinema in the framework of reality. In such a situation, George Lucas did not even dream while making the first film that he could make a sequel for it after its completion; Let alone making a complete trilogy. So he kept his expectations low when the first film was released to be ready for anything.

      But his film quickly became a universal phenomenon and slowly and steadily made its way into the heart of popular culture. This brilliance went to the point where the word "cinematic blockbuster" entered the vocabulary of cinematographic cultures and literature after this trilogy. The reason for that, in addition to the power of Lucas's creativity, comes back to the unique world of this trilogy, which makes each of them able to take the audience with them alone. This success continued to the point where fan groups were formed for these three films; That too in the world before cyberspace, not in today's world where any film and any actor can achieve this success with a few fake fan pages.

      The next two films of this trilogy expand the same initial world They gave and pinned the characters to the story so that it is hard for the audience to miss them. Today, by evaluating all aspects, it is clear that this series of films have all the characteristics of a complete success: they are both the attention of audiences all over the world, they have captivated critics, and their signs and symbols have many fans among people and basically beyond a Films have become a cultural phenomenon.

      Such a fictional story that even its robots find characters and bring the audience's sympathy with them, caused the constant temptation of Hollywood companies to come to them. In the form of non-stop sequels, it will drag on until today and spoil those good memories. Today's sequels may be slightly successful in terms of sales, but they have never been able to repeat the success of the original trilogy.

      A year after the events of the previous film, Luke Skywalker tries to lose his friend, Han Solo. Save your job. Meanwhile, the Empire is trying to use another Death Star to defeat its opposing forces. After freeing Han Solo, Luke Skywalker goes to Yoda to complete his training, but Yoda tells him on his deathbed that Luke has nothing else to do but face his father, Darth Vader...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.