Home > Art and cinema > Movies and series
Reading time estimate: 18 min

10 great cinematic adaptations that were not faithful to the source of their adaptation

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

Nobody said you had to go exactly with the book. adaptations that take on the color of reality are astonishing because they are always accompanied by the question: "How faithful will the film be?" For fans of the novel or the original story, it is very heartwarming to see that the story they love is portrayed in a completely different way. Needless to say, sometimes the writer knows the best, and the additions or omissions caused by screenwriters or directors ultimately make the film's cinematic experience more painful than enjoyable. But from time to time you watch a film that has done the impossible. It is not only sensible and conscious, but also of astonishing quality. The following 10 films are films that have challenged common norms and rules; Unfaithful adaptations that may seem to break the taboo and insult the originality of the story, but in return bring a unique cinematic experience.

  • 15 Alfred Hitchcock's best film from the worst to the best (filmmaker under a magnifying glass)

1. Dr. Strangelove ( Dr. Strangelove )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1964/England & America
  • Director: Stanley Kubrick
  • strong Cast: Peter Sellers, George C. Scott, Sterling Hayden and
  • Metacritic Score: 97 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score: 98 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 8/4 out of 10
  • Adapted source:

Stanley Kubrick is known for making one of the most biofatal adaptations in the history of cinema. Nevertheless, "Shine" is perhaps the most famous example of a list on the list, a film that was so awkwardly screened from the book that Stephen King denounced the film and its intention to present an adaptation of his book and turn it into a film. However, other people praised the film. But "Dr. Strangelove," another adaptation of Kubrick, is another good example, such as "Shine." "Red Warning," the title of the novel on which the film is based, takes a serious, cold, and systematic look at Cold War suspicions that leave no room for laughter. Dr. Strangelove, on the other hand, is the opposite of the novel. He makes a joke out of the weird features of nuclear warfare and jokes about it. The main character of the film, Dr. Strangelove, is not even in the book itself. He is a man made only for cinema, a hilarious character who struggles with the nausea of Nazism and is not present in the novel at all. Not only have the surviving characters changed their names to make a comedy impact, like the president whose name appears in Merkin Mafley, but their nature has also changed dramatically. Jack Ripper may still find Russians waiting. They have a good opportunity to attack the Americans on time, but he believes that they are trying to turn the Americans into communists through the fluids that are injected into their bodies. An efficient and competent president becomes a hesitant leader who can not even have a serious conversation with the Soviet leader. But it is only because of these changes that the film can succeed. Its stupidity, exaggeration, and complete lack of seriousness are the reasons why this film is revered as one of the greatest and most enduring bitter satires of all time.

2. Starship Troopers ( Starship Troopers )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1997/USA
  • Director: Paul Verhoeven
  • Cast: Casper Van Dean, Dina Mir, Dennis Richards and
  • Metacritic Score: 51 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score: </66> 66 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 7/2 out of 10
  • source adapted: Star Wars by Robert E. Heinline

In a similarly shocking way, "Star Wars" is an adaptation of another novel that deals with the tensions of the Cold War and appeals to anything to laugh about. The book, like Red Warning, has no humor at all, and mostly has to do something about what it wants to say. "Star Wars" to The title of a novel aims to offer a different perspective on war and violence. He wants to incite the Americans against the Soviets, because his point is that in the end an efficient, noble and worthy society will have the courage to do what is right and what it should do, even at the cost of murder.

Verhoeven astronaut warriors are quite the opposite. The film is an anti-war work in every moment, and at every step it takes, it relinquishes bigoted patriotism and nationalism, and shatters the courage and bravery for supremacy and stupid success. While the book does not take a deep look at love, it turns to Dennis Richards's film and makes good use of him and his face to ridicule war films. Rico does it like a book, not for the country, but for a girl. High school elements add a lot of childish and lousy stuff to astronaut warriors that is hardly recognizable in Highline novels. It is a film that is not ashamed of its second-rate tendencies, its action scenes are bloody and funny, and its jokes respond exceptionally well, turning the film into a classic cult work. In fact, this film ironically conveys a message contrary to the book and never gives up its style and context in the form of beautiful works of the late 90's.

3. adaptation ( adaptation )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 2002/USA
  • Director: Spike Jones
  • Actors: <//> Nicholas Cage, Meryl Streep, Chris Cooper and
  • Metacritic Score: 83 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitosis Score: 91 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 7/7 out of 10
  • source of adaptation: The Orchid Thief by Susan Orleans

Is "adaptation" an adaptation? More than any other work on this list, this film asks us how far a person can change the original source before it changes its meaning completely, and this is not a question that is asked in the subtext but by the main character. It becomes. At the end, Charlie Kaufman replaces the original "Orchid Thief" storyline, from which he adapts. The story of "Adaptation" is not only about the pain that exists in adapting something, but also depicts the effort to become a genuine artist and author. Because Charlie Kaufman is a thinker, the subject is tied to a book-dependent part of the film. And it's the loss of insight and emotion when you are deeply fascinated by something in particular that Charlie Kaufman, who is both the author and the main character of the story, naturally quarrels with. He radically changes the events and focus of the book, but leaves some elements intact. Chris Cooper, an unusual orchid collector, is here with Orleans himself, where the role of Meryl Streep is always astonishing, but his compositions make the film a great work.

The main storyline is one piece Self-referentiality is the struggle of a screenwriter who rewrites the entire book, to the extent that Kaufman admits that it is only about flowers. But in making the story, not only did Jones and Kaufman feel comfortable changing the novel, but Orleans himself was pleased that Jones was making a film in which Orleans struggled to make something unique and entice people to consume it. , Empathizes, even if what he builds, if he did not make significant changes, the worker could not fall.

4. Brother, where are you? (? O Brother, Where Art Thou )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 2000/USA, UK and France
  • Director: Coen Brothers
  • Cast: George Clooney, John Torturo, Tick Blake Nelson and
  • Metacritic Score: 69 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz score: 78 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 7/7 From 10
  • Adapted Source: Homer's Odyssey

The Coen brothers jokingly denied that they had not read the Odyssey even once "Brother, where are you?" It is a free and enjoyable adaptation of Homer's epic poem. From a fictional point of view, there are several references to the main work, such as John Goodman, who is the impersonator of Cyclops (a one-eyed giant in Greek mythology), and the seductive woman, who is the impersonator, but someone unfamiliar with Homer may not know the original source. Brother, he covers his Greek roots with an adventurous high-pitched adventure in the age of American distress. The film goes astray from Odysseus' long and irreversible journey and tells the story of Ulysses escaping with It gives us a wonderful set of idiots.

With the new atmosphere and scene design, new side characters are added to the story to confront the protagonist, and this is where the Quinns, fictional and lively characters from the 1930s and's. Thoughts and ideas give to play with it. Whether it's the famous bank robbers, the "Three Who", the opportunistic music producers, "Brother, where are you?" Gives a collection of new sub-stories that look more like a collection of America's greatest struggling events rather than a needle-like homer. The high-pitched dialogues of the Quinns create a colorful and witty film that is very different from the poetic and exhilarating descriptions and dialogues of what it is based on. While much of the's brother's owes much to the Odyssey, its differences give rise to a completely original work, a musical work that takes place in the southwest of America. With an identity that is entirely his own.

5. Who sewed slippers for Roger Rabbit? (? Who framed Roger Rabbit )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1988/USA
  • Director: Robert Zamkis
  • Actors : Bob Haskins, Christopher Lloyd, Charles Fleischer and
  • Metacritic Score: 83 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitosis Score: </97> 97 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 7/7 out of 10
  • source adaptation: Who censored Roger Rabbit? Gray Ki effect. Wolf

"Who sewed shoes for Roger Rabbit?" There are many examples where the creator of the original work actually liked the changes made in the adaptation, and how could he not like it? The merger of the Looney Tunes and Disney characters was an opportunity that no one should have missed, but changes had to be made in making a film with the characters. With the addition of these cat characters, who sewed slippers for Roger Rabbit? It has definitely become more fantasy and a family adventure. Private detective Eddie Valiant seems to be the only one who wants to take everything seriously, and even his efforts with the main character are always unusually ineffective, not even the main character of the novel.

In fact, Roger Rabbit will soon have his fate announced in the novel. Now the basis of the story is to find the person who killed him and who wanted to stifle his voice in the process. The early scenes of his assassination give the novel a tone that is clearly influenced by 1940s tape films. Jessica Rabbit is a character who is mostly a charming woman and Eddie Valiant does not have a strange and western cartoon world to face her pessimism. The only thing is the merger of the famous comic book characters, not the cartoons, and none of them have the unusual sequences of Duffy and Donald Duck that have a one-on-one battle with the pianos. But since Gary Kay. Wolff acknowledges that the revolutionary integration of cartoons and the real world was essential to make the story more tangible to the audience. Most importantly, the fusion of the two worlds has been masterfully done, making it a one-time cinematic experience with the ingenuity and layers of many of the many blockbusters on offer at the time.

6. Children of Men ( Children of Men )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 2006/USA, UK and Japan
  • Director: Alfonso Cuarn
  • Cast: Clive Owen, Julianne Moore, Claire Hope Ashiti and
  • Metacritic Score: 84 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score: 92 out of 100
  • User Rating IMDb to Movie: 7/9 out of 10
  • Adapted source: Children of the Pie effect. January. James

"Children of Man" is known as one of the greatest science fiction films of the 21st century. Ruin City This film, which is extremely detailed, is accompanied by skillful directing and a strong sense of dynamism. Human Children is like a road trip in which the character of Clive Owen has to transport the only fertile woman on the planet to protect her and her newborn child from the violent world of film. But the film's main storyline is only a small part of the book.

Children of Man is not just about this particular journey, it is only about the desperate struggle of humanity, but about the confrontation of political goals and a unique male devil who For all that, it's clear why all men in the book are infertile. The novel, before it even became popular, has extensive explanations of patriarchy and is intertwined with rich subtexts. Religious themes are present throughout the novel, and great attention is paid to explanations About the oppressive British government and the fighters of an unknown resistance movement who are dissatisfied with its actions.

The children of man have undeniable power but take it from a completely different source. The film's ability and strength lies in the story of this man's change and how he radically changes his worldview to help humanity survive in the most desperate time of need. The film is an amazing technical work with incredibly long shots and is perhaps Cuaron's greatest achievement in the film, especially the flawless car attack that occurs early in the film. The liberties exercised by the film are likely to frustrate many of the novel's devoted fans, but those who are able to see its unique insight will attest to its emotional fluctuations and vibrant, vibrant realized world.

7. Blade Runner ( Blade Runner )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1982/USA and Hong Kong
  • Director: Ridley Scott
  • strong Cast: Harrison Ford, Ruther Howard, Sean Young and
  • Metacritic Score: 84 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score : 89 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 8/1 out of 10
  • Adapted Source: Do Artificial Humans Dream of Electric Sheep? The effect of Philip K. Dick

Maybe no one is as big as Philip Kay. Dick has been so disrespected in the adaptations. The author of the legendary science fiction genre, almost always his works have almost always been manipulated and distorted in terms of quality, but also the purpose of the story has changed. "Do synthetics dream of electric sheep?" And "Blade Runner" both have a spiritual connotation in our minds in terms of the main concept, but the approach to the goal is completely different.

Blade Runner's heavy religious elements of the novel and its particular focus on animals Turns away and turns his attention to the idea of human consciousness and experience. The depths that have long plagued critics relate to artificial humans and the idea of human qualities in them. Blade Runner uses these fictitious creatures to ask the important questions that arise at the point of curiosity between us and other organisms, and whether or not these claims are true. The symbolic monologue on the bati is an idea summed up in a mesmerizing monologue, but in the original book, artificial humans are terrifying. Surprisingly, Blade Runner has made its mark on the history of film thanks to the crossing of a border that Dick has openly drawn on the sand. Dick clearly states the difference between humans and anthropomorphs, and draws attention to the difference between real and mechanical animals as well. For this reason, it is clear why Descartes had to kill in the first place in order to reach the real animal. Most amazing of all, the atmosphere of the cyberpunk city is so impressive that Blade Runner is nowhere to be found in the novel, whose atmosphere is like an abandoned land. Blade Runner is a prime example of an adaptation, a translation that seems to deliberately and intentionally deviate from the original text, yet nevertheless aptly goes its own way.

8. The Wizard of Oz ( The Wizard of Oz )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1939/USA
  • Director: Victor Fleming
  • Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, Ray Bulger and
  • Metacritic Score: 92 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score : 98 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 8 out of 10
  • Adapted from: The Amazing Wizard of the City by L. Frank Baum

It's a real challenge to see "The Wizard of the City" is nothing more than a fantasy journey of innocent families, but the novel is an astonishing distraction from the film's subtle spirit. The novel follows Dorty as a character on her journey to the land, but the taste of the book is bitter and terrifying. Almost every section of the book is a metaphor for symbolizing the issues and implications of the heyday of American politics, where corruption has probably always been high. Alongside this edge imbued with black humor, violence and dark backgrounds are surprisingly present throughout the book, whether the tin man beheads forty wolves or the evil wizard who captures the monkeys and uses them as ammunition against Dorothy.

When we look at the film, it's very difficult to see how those elements were successfully adapted in the 1930s, and whether or not those elements even They were worth it to find a replacement. The Wizard of the City is one of the greatest works of the fantasy genre of all time, a musical with a theme of a desire to escape from reality that the audience has never seen before. Nearly a century later, its charm, warmth, and flawless progression, and its endearing characters, seem to have been the only way the city wizard could be portrayed, even if it is a significant reflection of what the original author wrote. He wanted to paint it.

9. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory ( Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1971/USA
  • Director: Mel Stewart
  • Cast: Jane Wilder, Jack Albertson, Peter Ostrom and
  • Metacritic Score: 67 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score: 91 out of 100
  • User Rating IMDb to Movie: 7/8 of 10
  • Adapted from: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Ronald Dahl

Once again, a dark childhood classic in cinematic form Has been abandoned. There are a number of small differences between Ronald Dahl's novel and Jane Wilder's film, such as the fact that Charlie's father has been eliminated and the family is almost non-existent as a disturbing issue. But what has always been strange about Dahl is how Jane Wilder and Mel Stewart changed Willie Vanka's soul. Willy Wonka is in the book The Evil and Mysterious Force, which is not supposed to be loved by all people of all ages. Black comedy is drawn to the death of characters like Veruca and descriptions of factory spaces like the Chocolate River. Many have explored the film in more depth and how Willy Vanka is not as good as it sounds, but all of that insight is ultimately very straightforward in the book.

2005 adaptation Finally It is much more faithful to Dal's novel, but its not-so-high quality means it has no place on this list. Not every adaptation has to be completely faithful in order for the worker to fall and offer a useful cinematic experience. Jane Wilder and her bubbly persona make the film more about her than Charlie, but it also makes her an unforgettable role-playing, resulting in one of the most popular films of the 1970s.

10. First Blood ( First Blood )

BingMag.com 10 <b>great</b> <b>cinematic</b> <b>adaptations</b> <b>that</b> <b>were</b> not <b>faithful</b> to the <b>source</b> of <b>their</b> adaptation

  • Product: 1982/USA
  • Director: Ted Kachoff
  • Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Richard Kerna, Brian Denney and
  • Metacritic Score: 61 out of 100
  • Raton Tomitoz Score: 85 out of 100
  • User rating IMDb to movie: 7/7 out of 10
  • source adaptation: The first blood of David Morel

Many of the films on this list did not want to change the main storyline, but rather to change the atmosphere and atmosphere of the story. This was largely because changing the tone and direction of the context provided a good opportunity for comparison rather than adaptations focused on different sub-stories. This is not the case with the last film on the list, the highly enduring 1980s film The First Blood. In his book, The First Blood takes a poignant look at the psychological trauma of men in the post-Vietnam War world. Rambo, as a character, is at an irreversible point by killing Batusel police officers for his skill and faith. This is where the colonel ultimately has no choice but to kill him. Rambo has not yet left the forest. He is there, and the sins he has committed at home are not being properly punished. Performs to present a positive outline of Rambo's enduring personality. He is not directly responsible for the murder of any of the police officers, which allows the audience to give him the right why he should survive at the end of the film. The pure movement of the character and the story still finds its way into the film, but it is full of popular and entertaining scenes. Its action is controlled by Qabas compared to other films released at the time, but ultimately, it is an action film that does not depict the overly politicized emotions of the novel. However, in his quest to become an action work that remains part of the book's mental effusions, he finds himself in a competition full of terms and methods for action plays that has injected intelligence into a two-hour hobby. p>

Source: Taste of Cinema

READ NEXT IN: art and cinema / movies and series

BingMag.com Dust house; Why is Netflix no longer as popular as it used to be? movies and series

Each era is defined by the major initiatives that took place during that period, and sometimes only one company bears the entire burden. Examples from Ford more than a century ago and Virgin in the 19

BingMag.com Top 6 Disney Animations That Deal With Real Life Problems movies and series

Disney is best known for its magical and childish image, but there are moments when it conveys important social messages through movies and TV shows that not only It is very important and effective fo

BingMag.com Tchaikovsky's wife film; Ashrafzadeh, the lover of the actor and Mr. musician (Cannes Festival 2022) movies and series

The film "Tchaikovsky's Wife" directed by Kirill Sbernikov depicts a story based on love and hate.

BingMag.com Critique of the film 'Boy from Heaven'; A sophisticated espionage trailer in the Egyptian religious space (Cannes Film Festival 2022) movies and series

"Boy from Heaven", the latest film by Egyptian-Swedish director Tariq Saleh, is one of the entries in the competition section of the Cannes International Film Festival 2022.